There’s been a lot of speculation in Ottawa this week about the imminent cabinet shuffle as a number of ministers have announced their retirement from federal politics. Here’s what we know.
We’re hearing that the shuffle is now scheduled for tomorrow (Monday)
Who is out:
Confirmed retirements: Toews (Public Safety), Ablonczy (DFATD, Consular affairs), Menzies (Associate minister of finance), Ashfield (Fisheries, ACOA)
Likely retirements: Kent (Environment), Ritz (Agriculture), O’Connor (Whip)
With O’Connor retiring, we’ve independently confirmed that Pierre Poilievre is getting the promotion and will sit as the other National Capital Region minister in cabinet with John Baird.
I’ve also heard that MacKay will be shuffled in a one-for-one swap where his legal skills will be of use (likely Justice). This was a shuffle certainty a while ago but this might have changed since.
With Ashfield out, Rob Moore is his likely (but unconfirmed) replacement.
Nobody expects Jim Flaherty to be shuffled out of Finance as his intention is to balance the budget by the next election.
We’re told the Prime Minister had fireside chats with members of his cabinet and from caucus to discuss their future plans. Older ministers who are retiring have been asked to step aside for new blood. Older ministers who have not indicated an intention to retire may have been asked to do the same (Kent). The only exception to this might be Flaherty and Oliver (both are in critically important political files at key junction points — Flaherty and budget balance and Oliver on the KXL decision).
One of my sources on the cabinet shuffle told me to expect a lot of new faces in cabinet.
Shelly Glover has been spotted in Ottawa today. She is a Manitoba MP who many observers speculate will be occupying a chair at Prime Minister Harper’s cabinet table.
I will update this post as I learn more.
Here’s the latest leftwing click-bait from the Huffington Post on offer today,
Stephen Harper’s Wireless Petition Probably Just Trolling For Your Personal Data
Prime Minister Stephen Harper wants you to know he’s on your side in the epic battle of consumers against Big Telecom’s big wireless bills.
Or maybe it’s the Conservative Party trying to get your name and email address, so they can spam you with political ads.
Either way, a post appeared on Harper’s Facebook page Wednesday linking to a Conservative Party petition called “Standing Up For Wireless Consumers.”
The Facebook post urges people to “sign the petition if you believe Canadians will benefit from more choice and greater competition among wireless providers.”
Oh, is that so? Here’s Marc Garneau’s Liberal Party data-collection petition on Usage Based Billing. Huffington Post stories about the Liberal Party’s creepy data collection efforts? 0.
And here’s an NDP petition (data collection website) against extra fees on cellphone bills. Huffington Post cynicism about political outreach by the NDP? Non-existent.
I tried to find a Green Party petition on wireless usage, but my wifi signal gave out.
Here, Huffington Post writes about Avaaz’s data-collection website for collecting the email addresses of Sun News haters. As a cynical news story about the political process of issue identification and data collection? No! It was written as a news story about the critiques of Sun News.
There is a trend among Ottawa journalists to write about the political processes as if they were recently unearthed from some dank pit from behind Karl Rove’s creepy house (the one with the unhinged screen door that has the tear). These tried-and-true political tactics are repackaged to ignorant readers in an alarm-raising tone.
BREAKING NEWS! Did you know that Conservatives do GOTV?
BREAKING NEWS! Did you know that Conservatives keep a database of their supporters?
BREAKING NEWS! Did you know that Conservatives call people to identify their levels of support?
BREAKING NEWS! Conservatives use American-style robocalls!
BREAKING NEWS! Did you know that Conservatives use social advertising on segments to test messaging?
BREAKING NEWS! Did you know that Conservatives use petitions to do issue identification?
BREAKING NEWS! Any political party that hopes to win an election in the modern era will do all of the above.
BREAKING NEWS! Obama does it too? Well, nevermind then. He’s doing the best he can.
There’s an election in Canada. And the classic divide is between two parties.
One party has been endorsed by the National Post, the other by the Globe and Mail.
One party accuses the other of racism, sexism and homophobia, while the other party acuses the other of runaway spending, patronage and corruption.
One party is supported by Preston Manning, the other by Joe Clark.
One party is looking to end a political dynasty, the other is desperately looking to hold on to the same.
One party advises voters cast ballots based on their values, the other urges voters to vote strategically to stop their opponents.
One party raises issues relevant to the actual interests of the electorate, the other raises red herrings such as abortion and same-sex marriage.
One party has support in a diversity of places, the other is dug in in urban centres.
One party has the support of small business owners and frontline workers, while the other has traded favours for union support.
One party is rooted in Alberta’s character, while the other takes direction from downtown Toronto.
One could have been describing the past,
or the present.