Memo to the Globe and Mail

Bad Brian Laghi!
Bad Gloria Galloway!

It’s time for these two reporters at the Globe and Mail to throw out their address books, because they are horribly inaccurate.

In a front page article in today’s Globe and Mail, Laghi and Galloway jump all over the CPC OLO staff restructuring like two Quebec Liberal ad-men on a sponsorship contract.

The problem is, as evidenced by the many slapping of CPC foreheads this morning, is that they quote Toronto “Party organizer” Carol Jamieson as some kind of dissenting senior member of the Conservative Party.

“Those who have been fired “are either people who are dissenting about what Harper is doing or they are former Progressive Conservatives,” said Carol Jamieson, a party organizer in Toronto.

“It looks to me right now that within four weeks, the entire structure will be Canadian Alliance.”

These poor reporters without enough time to check their facts neglected to discover that Carol Jamieson is neither an organizer for the Conservative Party… nor (wait for it)… is she even a member of the Conservative Party of Canada!

UPDATE: Bad Stephen Taylor too!

Breaking news: new senior staff leadership in the OLO

It’s not often that I get to break news, but its always fun when I have the opportunity.

One of my senior sources in the party has informed me:

Mike Donison is the new executive director of the Conservative Party

Ian Brodie is the new chief of staff in the OLO (Harper’s office) after what party insiders say was a remarkable one year stint at the party level.

You heard it here first.

UPDATE: Ok, you might have heard the Brodie news first at the Conservative Hipster, but I’m still claiming the Donison scoop 😉

What if this happened in Canada?

Can you imagine if a natural disaster on the scale of Hurricane Katrina happened in Canada? What similarities can we draw and what differences can we discern?

First of all, Canada is not prone to hurricanes but a similar flooding disaster could happen in Vancouver.

As with the Asian tsunami that befell Southeast Asia last year, an oceanic earthquake off of the coast of Vancouver could submerge most of the city and wash away many victims.

The current outcry by many observers on the left describes a slow response by President George W. Bush and they decry erroneously that America was largely unprepared due to the number of national guardsmen in Iraq. The same armchair critics on the other hand describe that Canada does not require a military and that Conservative efforts to increase defence spending is brutish and unbecoming of Canadian ‘values’. The same people would declare that Canada’s military deficiencies would be adequately supplemented by our American friends. Not a single part of this illogical equation adds up.

Would our current leadership be decisive in handling such a natural disaster? The current Canadian Liberal leadership has been wholly unprepared and dithering on defence issues ranging from BMD to the lacking expression of military ability when it comes to defending our Arctic sovereignty against the likes of a country like Denmark.

For the past twelve years, as stewards of Canada’s national defence, the Liberal Party of Canada has allowed the erosion of our military spending has placed our defence and disaster relief capabilities in the dire position of complete collapse. Queen’s professor Douglas Bland mused as much in his study titled “Canada Without Armed Forces?”.

Whether rightly or wrongly, George W. Bush is likely to face significant questions of leadership for the speed of the federal/state/local response to the disaster that struck the Gulf States in the southern US. One does not require a considerable extension of thought to determine with adequate certainty that if an analogous distaster befell a major populated area in Canada, this country would be grossly unprepared to address it with the speed and unequivocal response required to protect the lives of this nation’s citizenry.

This question needs to be addressed now by our country’s government. We cannot allow certain failures of this magnitude to be the footnotes in the post-mortem report of a devastating natural disaster.