Holiday weekend catch-up

Ok, so I took a few days off from blogging during the holiday weekend. Thanks to everybody that stopped by the site regardless. After visiting the parents on the weekend, it’s time to catch-up, yet as with any half-assed blogging catch-up attempt, things that have happened have already been well-discussed. So, instead I’ll do something that I clearly do not do enough: link some of the great sites and posts that have caught my attention recently.

Len has contributed his latest Blogging Tories carnival in what has become known as the Big Blue Bash. Check out parts one and two.

Andrew from BBG has contributed a few posts and has compiled the blogosphere response to the recent earthquake in Pakistan. I found the following story on Nealenews today and shook my head. What a misguided and inappropriate take on the earthquake.

Go vote in the Small Dead Blog awards. I’m nominated in a category and it’s a good one: “Best Canadian Political Blog”. Go vote once every 24 hours and help this blogger out.

Mulroney is the godfather of the Conservative Party? He certainly is one of its most significant living figures (if not the most). A lot of Conservatives look up to the former PM for inspiration and some for political advice. Here’s an article by Dan Dugas, and you’d think that he’s worried that Mulroney will return to lead Canada. Count the number of times he discounts anything positive with negative qualifiers.

You can always count on the widely-read Canadian blogger Greg Staples for intelligent political analysis. Of course, Greg provides some balance to life by peppering his blog with sports and entertainment news.

Darren Barefoot is a “technologist” from Vancouver meaning he’s got his finger on important developments in our medium and spots a lot of future trends before they become mainstream. Darren recently spotted Google Reader and the Million Pixel Homepage. He also runs Northern Voice: Canada’s annual blogging conference.

Fellow Blogging Tory Paul, who runs Blue Blogging Soapbox, has been on fire lately producing pages and pages of original political content and analysis. Paul and I are co-contributing to a new project that follows the details of the Liberal party’s next Adscam: Technoscam.

Monte was in Vegas backing up his friend Chuck. Jeff Watson weighs in on Dingwall. James Moore blasts out of the gate with his new blog. Steven Fletcher appeals to Canadians to give to earthquake relief.

I think that I might add Chinese to my (sometimes dusty) language portfolio. I found this great site which helps the visitor learn Chinese with podcasting. It’s free, but the paid option looks like it might be worth investigating.

I found this recent article in The Economist detailing a strange but hopeful source of alternative energy. It sounds a little farfetched, but for those that have pondered the viability of harnessing the power of a hurricane for constructive purposes, this article will make you speculate.

Canadian blogging guru, and fellow Crazy Go Nuts University alumnus Joey Devilla and his new bride made the Toronto Star this weekend. Their engagement was chronicled via blog and the MSM says “This blogging thing is the new rage… Print it!”. Congrats Joey and Wendy!

Hockey started last week, but did you know that Canada and the US have the longest international rivalry in cricket? It’s true! (and the details of the rivalry give an example of the quirky relationship that our two countries share).

The Dingwall factor

Will the Liberals flip-flop on Dingwall’s severance? What are the consequences for Paul Martin if he does? Is it a lawsuit, or does Dingwall sing on Adscam? After all, Dingwall was the one who hired Chuck Guite. Could Dingwall be the linchpin upon which the fortune of Paul Martin’s government rests? It could very well be lose-lose for Mr. Martin, but does protecting Dingwall do the most to protect the electibility of the Liberal party?

A poll (fresh off the Blackberrys), indicates that l’Affair Dingwall has cost the Liberals 50% of their leading margin over the Conservative Party.

OTTAWA (CP) _ Recent spending scandals may have hurt the federal Liberals in the eyes of voters, a new poll indicates.
The Pollara poll suggests the gap in public favour between the Liberals and the Conservatives has narrowed. Despite failing to gain any ground in crucial Ontario ridings, Pollara says Stephen Harper’s Conservatives saw their national popular support numbers inch to within six percentage points of the Liberals in late September.

Pollara surveys conducted over the summer months indicated a 10- to 12-percentage point gap between the Grits and Tories.

But the Paul Martin government has been hammered recently by controversy over David Dingwall. Dingwall quit his job as president of the Royal Canadian Mint amid allegations of overspending and improper lobbying.

Is Paul Martin in disaster management mode? Is this why we’re getting vague, recited and repeated answers from Revenue Minister John MacCallum in the House? Particularly startling is the dissent on Paul Martin’s insistence on Dingwall’s severance from voices within his own cabinet and from within the Liberal caucus. In other words, is the secret so damaging that senior Liberal ministers of the Crown aren’t even in on the gameplan?

Paul Martin hasn’t blinked at wasting untold wads of taxpayer cash in the past and if denying Dingwall’s severance would result in a lawsuit (against the government, not against the Liberals), then why isn’t he going up against Dingwall? It’s surprising that one man could make the government blink with the threat of a lawsuit. Perhaps it is the Liberal Party proper that is blinking at what Dingwall knows about Adscam.

Martin not listening to his own caucus on Dingwall

Conservatives have been putting pressure on Paul Martin all week for standing up for David Dingwall and defending his severance.

However, even some Liberals are questioning Paul Martin’s defence of the gum-expensing former Liberal cabinet minister:

“I’m ticked off and so are my constituents. My constituents are ticked off about the fact that somebody would put in an expense claim for $1.79 for gum. Give me a break. This is ridiculous,” said Joe Fontana (Minister of Labour). (Calgary Herald, October 6, 2005)

“Hell no. How can you support someone who has put in a claim for $1.79 for gum?” — Joe Fontana (Windsor Star, October 6, 2005)

“If he thinks he deserves a severance package after having quit, then he should sue for it. I don’t think he should be entitled to it,” said Fontana. “He needs to answer for some of those ridiculous expenses.” (Windsor Star, October 6, 2005)

Labour Minister Joe Fontana said he’s getting an earful from constituents angry that Dingwall could get a severance package after claiming $750,000 in expenses last year. “It’s not that the government supported what he’s done, hell no,” Fontana said. “How can you support someone who’s put in a claim for $1.79 for gum?” (Toronto Sun, October 6, 2005)

“The feeling in caucus is very strong . . . he should not get any severance,” said Liberal MP Samite Bulte (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage), national caucus chair. “People are concerned because it destroys our credibility as wanting to clean up the problems. We need to keep assuring Canadians that we intend to keep our word in this.” (Calgary Herald, October 6, 2005)

Bulte (Parkdale-High Park) said most Grits feel that a golden handshake will tarnish their leader’s reputation for cleaning up dirty business practices like those which led to the sponsorship scandal. (Winnipeg Sun, October 6, 2005)

Bulte said unless Martin cleans the mess up, Liberals will pay for it at the polls in the upcoming federal election. “Is the Dingwall affair hurting us? Yes, it is,” she said. (Toronto Sun, October 6, 2005)

Both Bulte and Whitby-Oshawa MP Judi Longfield said Martin should force Dingwall to sue for a golden parachute. (Winnipeg Sun, October 6, 2005)

“I don’t believe he deserves a severance package and if he feels he does he can, take it to court and let the courts decide,” Whitby-Oshawa MP Judi Longfield (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour) said. (Toronto Sun, October 6, 2005)

Liberal MP Francoise Boivin (Gatineau), a former labour lawyer and now chair of the Liberal Women’s Caucus, said she was puzzled by the reported legal advice suggesting there are laws requiring Mr. Dingwall be paid severance. “If someone in the Justice Department can send me a copy of this law, it would be my pleasure to read it.” Ms. Boivin said she hoped the government would get something more thorough than a verbal opinion before making any severance payment to Mr. Dingwall. (Globe and Mail, October 6, 2005)

Toronto Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport) slammed Dingwall for double dipping. “He’s got an MP’s pension. He was in here for about 16 or 17 years. We can’t double dip . . . period, full stop,” said Karygiannis. (Calgary Herald, October 6, 2005)

“My constituents are telling me we shouldn’t (pay a severance).” — Karygiannis (Halifax Daily News, October 6, 2005)

These Liberal MPs are questioning Paul Martin’s dubious claims that David Dingwall deserves a severence for quitting after fleecing the taxpayer. Some are even questioning McCallum’s silly claims that there are “laws” that are forcing the taxpayer to pay Dingwall.

Paul Martin is more interested in keeping Dingwall happy (for whatever reason) than for Standing up for Canadians.

The Conservative Party exposed and now continue to question this unwarranted and suspicious payoff. Now some Liberals are following the Conservative Party’s lead.