Press Gallery’s Turf War

The Parliamentary Press Gallery (PPG) is the guild of Ottawa journalists that has been given the right to govern press access to Parliament Hill by the Speaker of the House via the Sergeant-at-Arms.

While this allows for the media to administrate media affairs on Parliament Hill, it can put the organization in conflict with the greater principles of free speech and press freedoms in this country. Longtime readers of this blog will remember my own run-in with the PPG when I tried to cover the budget-day proceedings on the Hill. In short, I concluded at the time as I do now: once the press fought for access, now the press guild is a gatekeeper of it.

The press mix on the Hill has evolved since the days when Gallery members told me that working for the Manning Centre disqualified me from reporting on the Hill. Now, Rabble and The Straight Goods are members of the Parliamentary Press Gallery. (not to mention China’s Xinhua!)

Today, Hill press upstart Blacklock’s Reporter announced that it is seeking legal remedy against the PPG for effectively blocking it from membership in the Parliamentary Press Gallery. Of course, this got my attention as someone that has fought for press access to the Hill for bloggers and new media.

Blacklock’s Reporter today served legal notice it will challenge a gag ruling that disqualifies the online publisher from the Ottawa Press Gallery unless management divulges proprietary information.
“If this precedent stands independent journalism is dead on Parliament Hill,” said Blacklock’s board. “No newspaper, radio or TV station would tolerate these arbitrary requirements, yet the gallery would ban an online publisher.”

But yet, Blacklock’s editor Tom Korski isn’t a stranger to strong-arm bully tactics of keeping reporters off of Parliament Hill however, if the PPG’s own minutes from February 8th, 2012 are to be believed,

Sun Media
The Gallery received a letter dated February 2, 2012 from member Tom Korski asking that the Gallery apply Section 10 of the Gallery Constitution and expel Sun Media from the Parliamentary Press Gallery. Section 10 provides that a member can be expelled if they use their membership or the facilities of the Gallery to obtain a benefit other than by journalism, including activities such as the representation of interests of political parties, governments. Tom Korski said Sun Media contravened that section of the Constitution in two cases – the Citizenship Reaffirmation Ceremony broadcast on SunTV in which federal bureaucrats posed as new Canadians and a 2005 case in which Brian Lilley and his family spoke in praise of government policy while appearing as grocery shoppers.

Korski himself tried to expel Sun Media from access to Parliament Hill. The PPG, to their credit rebuffed his request, yet were in the odious position of considering it. QMI (Sun Media) has the highest newspaper circulation in the country and their Quebec news channels (TVA and LCN) are among the very top-watched in the province.

Not satisfied with the PPG executive’s decision, Korski subsequently ran for it.

The Parliamentary Press Gallery is certainly set up to facilitate the business of reporting the news on Parliament Hill. Yet, it finds itself in the illiberal position of denying press freedom to citizens (reporters are simply citizens who ‘report’ — they are granted no special status by constitution or statute). Also, the Gallery seems to be rife with corporate and state-run (CBC) interests that seek to protect their turf. This Blacklock’s Reporter incident shows and serves to illustrate that PPG members will even move to protect their exclusive access by denying others and by trying to strip the press freedoms of their competition.



  • liz J

    The photo accompanying this thread is apropos.
    This is a turf war fighting against what democracy is all about, allowing all viewpoints to be heard.
    It’s basically a Liberal/Left fiefdom, no Conservatives need apply.

  • GabbyInQC

    So what happened to my laboriously crafted comment?

  • harebell

    So if I’m reading you correctly, you are upset because the PPG consists of the Press. This group consists of members of the media that includes the corporate (rightwing and pro-business) and the public (CBC) media. It has a democratically elected executive responsible for maintaining order and has done nothing you disagree with so far, except existing.
    You claim that they are trying to protect their exclusive access yet when they had the chance to dump Sun Media they didn’t do it. So in all reality they are actually only just ensuring that members of the press access the parliamentary press gallery and not just anyone who bowls up and says they are part of the press.
    What is controversial about the PPG being for the Press? If you want there to be a PBG for anyone with a keyboard then ask for one.

  • GabbyInQC

    OK, I’m going to try one more time. I edited my initial comment and am pretty sure (OK, 98% sure) I clicked on “save edit” so I don’t know what happened to it, so here goes …

    By my count of the PPP members’ list in your link, there are 70 members from the CBC and 24 from Radio-Canada. Talk about bloated! But that’s another issue.

    Please help me understand why Rabble gets to be accredited and Blacklock’s Reporter does not. Aren’t they both online-only publications? If one compares rosters:
    both include professional journalists, so why accept one but exclude the other?

    Also, why should Sun Media be expelled? Some crazy contradictions, IMO.

    On the issue of “access to the Hill for bloggers and new media”, though, my opinion has not changed from previous discussions on this topic, which Stephen Taylor and I happen to disagree on. If I understand his position correctly, sundry and all new media and bloggers should be allowed unlimited access to the Hill once they have obtained security clearance, which I assume means they have no criminal records or something similar.

    Despite my generally distrustful stance towards the MSM, I think they are justified in expecting that only properly accredited journalists be allowed to become members of that prestigious, if bloated, group. Just because I’ve mastered ;-) arithmetic does not mean I can carry out an audit; just because I’ve passed a St. John Ambulance course does not entitle me to practice medicine; and just because I can string together a number of sentences to present a well-reasoned argument or a reasonably faithful description of events does not mean I should be able to perform those functions on the Hill. Sorry, Stephen!

  • liz J

    IMO bloggers get a much better pulse of the people than any press gallery pundit if that counts for anything. I’m also betting they read the blogs and get a lot of info from them as well.