Housing
Homeownership, shelter costs, affordability, and core housing need. — 2021 Census of Population
Map loading...
Core Housing Need (%)
% of households in core housing need (failing adequacy, suitability, or affordability)
Distribution by riding
Share of households in core housing need by federal riding, 2021 Census. Median 9.2%; range 2.0% (Compton—Stanstead) to 32.9% (Nunavut); half of ridings between 6.7% and 12.1%. Canada: 10.1%.
Colour
- Canada 10.1%
Chart loading...
Vertical axis: Share of households in core housing need (%)
Each dot is one federal riding (343 with a figure; 2023 Representation Order), placed by its value and spread across the axis so that dots do not overlap. The line marks the value for Canada as a whole (10.1%). Prairies: Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Atlantic: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. North: Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population.
Highest and lowest ridings
Share of households in core housing need by federal riding, 2021 Census. 343 ridings ranked from highest (1) to lowest; tied values share a rank. Bars start at zero on one scale; the vertical line marks the value for Canada (10.1%).
10 highest
| Rank | Riding | Bar | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NunavutNU | 32.9% | |
| 2 | York South—Weston—EtobicokeON | 25.4% | |
| 3 | Humber River—Black CreekON | 24.4% | |
| 4 | Richmond Centre—MarpoleBC | 23.3% | |
| 5 | Scarborough Centre—Don Valley EastON | 22.8% | |
| 6 | Scarborough—WoburnON | 22.2% | |
| 7 | Scarborough—AgincourtON | 21.9% | |
| 7 | Toronto CentreON | 21.9% | |
| 9 | Vancouver CentreBC | 21.8% | |
| 10 | Vancouver EastBC | 21.7% |
10 lowest
| Rank | Riding | Bar | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 343 | Compton—StansteadQC | 2.0% | |
| 342 | BeauceQC | 2.1% | |
| 341 | Richmond—ArthabaskaQC | 2.2% | |
| 340 | Portneuf—Jacques-CartierQC | 2.3% | |
| 339 | Lévis—LotbinièreQC | 2.4% | |
| 338 | Chicoutimi—Le FjordQC | 2.5% | |
| 336 | JonquièreQC | 2.6% | |
| 336 | Saint-Maurice—ChamplainQC | 2.6% | |
| 335 | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel—AlnôbakQC | 2.7% | |
| 334 | Montmorency—CharlevoixQC | 2.8% |
All 343 ridings, ranked
Value: % of households in core housing need (failing adequacy, suitability, or affordability). Riding names link to the riding's dissemination-area map for this topic.
Housing — 2021 Census
Auto generated. Flag an issue.Housing in Canada
Housing affordability dominated public policy debate throughout the 2020s, and the 2021 Census provides the baseline data that frames the crisis. Nationally, 10.1 percent of Canadian households were in core housing need — meaning their housing was unaffordable, inadequate, or unsuitable and they could not afford an alternative. Another 23.4 percent spent 30 percent or more of their income on shelter costs (the standard affordability threshold). The housing topic maps 17 metrics including tenure (ownership vs. renting), shelter costs, dwelling values, core housing need, overcrowding, and subsidized housing that together reveal the fault lines of Canada's housing system.
Core Housing Need
Core housing need is Statistics Canada's composite measure of housing stress — a household must fail at least one of three tests (affordability, adequacy, suitability) and be unable to find acceptable alternative housing in their community at 30 percent of income.
Nunavut leads all ridings at 32.8 percent, where chronic housing shortages mean families of eight or more routinely share three-bedroom units. The next tier is dominated by immigrant-heavy GTA ridings: York South–Weston–Etobicoke (24.8%), Humber River–Black Creek (24.3%), and Scarborough Centre (22.2%). In these ridings, core need is driven primarily by affordability — recent immigrants paying market rent on modest incomes in an overheated Toronto housing market.
The lowest core housing need is found in rural Quebec: Richmond–Arthabaska and Compton–Stanstead (both 0.8%), Beauce (1.1%), Jonquière (1.1%). These are communities where housing is genuinely affordable — median dwelling values under $200,000 — and most residents own their homes outright or carry small mortgages.
Shelter Cost Burden
The 30-percent-of-income threshold for housing affordability captures a broader population than core housing need. At the riding level, the burden is heaviest in Toronto and Vancouver's most expensive neighbourhoods: Willowdale (42.5%), University–Rosedale (42.1%), and Vancouver Centre (41.7%).
These are ridings where high housing costs affect both renters and owners. In Willowdale, many homeowners are recent purchasers carrying large mortgages on Toronto's inflated prices, while renters face some of the highest market rents in the country. The pattern holds across the top ten: all are in the Toronto or Vancouver metro areas, where median dwelling values exceed $1 million.
Tenure: Owners and Renters
Canada's national homeownership rate was approximately 66.5 percent in 2021. But the riding-level data reveals extreme variation. The highest renter concentrations are in downtown cores: Laurier–Sainte-Marie (42.4% renter), Vancouver Centre (41.8%), and Toronto Centre (40.9%). These ridings are dominated by purpose-built rental apartments and investor-owned condos.
The highest ownership rates appear in rural and cottage-country ridings: Terra Nova–The Peninsulas (39.4% owner), South Shore–St. Margarets (37.8%), and Les Pays-d'en-Haut (37.2%). In these areas, low land costs and a tradition of homeownership mean that even modest-income households can own their homes.
Dwelling Values
The median dwelling value reveals Canada's housing geography in its starkest form. Vancouver Quadra leads all ridings at $2,381,454, followed by Vancouver Granville ($1,737,951) and Eglinton–Lawrence ($1,607,490). The top ten is split between Vancouver and Toronto, with West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast ($1,567,001) and North Vancouver–Capilano ($1,428,390) representing the North Shore.
At the bottom, New Brunswick dominates: Madawaska–Restigouche ($137,212), Miramichi–Grand Lake ($137,902), and Acadie–Bathurst ($138,706). The gap is staggering — a median home in Vancouver Quadra costs 17 times more than one in Madawaska–Restigouche. This ratio has widened steadily since the early 2000s as Vancouver and Toronto prices have detached from the rest of the country.
Overcrowding (Not Suitable)
The suitability standard measures whether a dwelling has enough bedrooms for its occupants based on the National Occupancy Standard. Nunavut again leads at 33.5 percent unsuitable, reflecting the territory's severe housing shortage. In southern Canada, overcrowding concentrates in immigrant-reception neighbourhoods: Humber River–Black Creek (24.4%), Etobicoke North (20.5%), Surrey Newton (19.8%), and Scarborough–Woburn (19.3%).
These are ridings where large multigenerational households occupy housing designed for smaller families, or where economic necessity forces multiple families to share a single unit. The overcrowding metric correlates strongly with core housing need and low income, making it a reliable indicator of housing stress.
Riding Rankings
Highest Core Housing Need
| Rank | Riding | Core Need % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nunavut | 32.8% |
| 2 | York South–Weston–Etobicoke | 24.8% |
| 3 | Humber River–Black Creek | 24.3% |
| 4 | Richmond Centre–Marpole | 22.9% |
| 5 | Scarborough Centre–Don Valley East | 22.2% |
| 6 | Vancouver Centre | 21.8% |
| 7 | Toronto Centre | 21.7% |
| 8 | Scarborough–Woburn | 21.6% |
| 9 | Scarborough–Agincourt | 21.3% |
| 10 | Vancouver East | 21.2% |
Apart from Nunavut, every riding on this list is in the Toronto or Vancouver metro areas — Canada's two most expensive housing markets. The GTA dominates with six ridings, all in the inner suburbs where recent immigrants settle and face the sharpest affordability pressures. These are not downtown condos but the mid-rise apartment corridors of Scarborough, North York, and Etobicoke where purpose-built rental stock has not kept pace with demand.
Lowest Core Housing Need
| Rank | Riding | Core Need % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richmond–Arthabaska | 0.8% |
| 2 | Compton–Stanstead | 0.8% |
| 3 | Beauce | 1.1% |
| 4 | Jonquière | 1.1% |
| 5 | Lévis–Lotbinière | 1.2% |
| 6 | Saint-Maurice–Champlain | 1.2% |
| 7 | Mégantic–L'Érable–Lotbinière | 1.3% |
| 8 | Montmorency–Charlevoix | 1.3% |
| 9 | Portneuf–Jacques-Cartier | 1.3% |
| 10 | Bécancour–Nicolet–Saurel–Alnôbak | 1.3% |
All ten are in Quebec — a remarkable finding that reflects the province's historically lower housing costs, higher homeownership rates in rural areas, and more extensive social housing system. The Beauce region in particular has some of the most affordable housing in southern Canada, with median dwelling values below $200,000 and a strong local manufacturing economy that provides stable employment.
Highest Median Dwelling Value
| Rank | Riding | Median Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Quadra | $2,381,454 |
| 2 | Vancouver Granville | $1,737,951 |
| 3 | Eglinton–Lawrence | $1,607,490 |
| 4 | West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky | $1,567,001 |
| 5 | Toronto–St. Paul's | $1,552,312 |
| 6 | Don Valley West | $1,523,285 |
| 7 | Vancouver Kingsway | $1,441,816 |
| 8 | North Vancouver–Capilano | $1,428,390 |
| 9 | University–Rosedale | $1,412,037 |
| 10 | Oakville East | $1,378,503 |
Vancouver claims five of the ten most expensive ridings — and Vancouver Quadra's median of $2.38 million is in a class of its own. The Toronto ridings on this list (Eglinton–Lawrence, Toronto–St. Paul's, Don Valley West, University–Rosedale) are all in the central city where detached homes regularly sell for over $2 million. Oakville East is the lone suburban entry, reflecting the maturation of the western GTA into a high-value housing market.
Lowest Median Dwelling Value
| Rank | Riding | Median Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madawaska–Restigouche | $137,212 |
| 2 | Miramichi–Grand Lake | $137,902 |
| 3 | Acadie–Bathurst | $138,706 |
| 4 | Sydney–Glace Bay | $156,344 |
| 5 | Terra Nova–The Peninsulas | $156,460 |
| 6 | Saint-Maurice–Champlain | $166,705 |
| 7 | Mégantic–L'Érable–Lotbinière | $168,846 |
| 8 | Tobique–Mactaquac | $169,746 |
| 9 | Côte-Nord–Kawawachikamach–Nitassinan | $171,574 |
| 10 | Central Nova | $175,000 |
New Brunswick claims three of the four cheapest ridings, with Cape Breton and Newfoundland close behind. These are regions of population decline where housing demand is falling even as the rest of Canada faces a supply crisis. A median home in Madawaska–Restigouche costs less than a year's rent in downtown Toronto — illustrating the two-speed nature of Canada's housing market.
Postal Code (FSA) Rankings
FSA-level data reveals neighbourhood-level extremes that riding averages conceal.
Most Expensive FSAs (Highest Median Dwelling Value)
| Rank | FSA | Area | Median Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | V6N | Vancouver (Kerrisdale) | $3,320,000 |
| 2 | V7S | West Vancouver (British Properties) | $3,200,000 |
| 3 | V6C | Vancouver (Coal Harbour) | $3,020,000 |
| 4 | V6L | Vancouver (Dunbar) | $3,020,000 |
| 5 | V7V | West Vancouver South | $2,900,000 |
| 6 | V6M | Vancouver (Marpole/South Granville) | $2,600,000 |
| 7 | V6R | Vancouver (Point Grey) | $2,600,000 |
| 8 | M2L | Toronto (Bridle Path/York Mills) | $2,500,000 |
| 9 | V7W | West Vancouver West | $2,500,000 |
| 10 | M2P | Toronto (Bayview Village) | $2,400,000 |
Vancouver dominates the most expensive list to a degree that no other Canadian city approaches. Eight of the top ten postal codes are in Vancouver or West Vancouver, with only two Toronto codes (M2L Bridle Path, M2P Bayview Village) breaking through. Kerrisdale (V6N) at $3.32 million is Canada's priciest postal code — a quiet residential neighbourhood of detached homes that has benefited from decades of capital inflows from Pacific Rim investors.
Least Expensive FSAs (Lowest Median Dwelling Value)
| Rank | FSA | Area | Median Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T6P | Edmonton (industrial) | $60,000 |
| 2 | E8G | Madawaska County, NB | $75,000 |
| 3 | E6A | Dieppe/Moncton area, NB | $80,000 |
| 4 | E9C | Campbellton, NB | $80,000 |
| 5 | E6J | Edmundston, NB | $85,000 |
| 6 | E8C | Grand Falls, NB | $90,000 |
| 7 | A0K | Northern Newfoundland | $100,000 |
| 8 | A0M | Central Newfoundland | $100,000 |
| 9 | B0L | Colchester County, NS | $100,000 |
| 10 | E4A | Southeast NB | $100,000 |
New Brunswick dominates the cheapest list even more thoroughly than Vancouver dominates the most expensive. Five of the ten least expensive postal codes are in New Brunswick's northern francophone communities, where population decline has suppressed housing demand for decades. T6P in Edmonton appears as an outlier — its very low median likely reflects a small number of dwelling transactions in a primarily industrial area. The 55-to-1 ratio between Kerrisdale ($3.32M) and T6P ($60K) captures the full spectrum of Canada's housing market in two data points.
Highest Core Housing Need (by FSA)
| Rank | FSA | Area | Core Need % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M4H | Toronto (Thorncliffe Park) | 41.2% |
| 2 | X0C | Nunavut | 37.4% |
| 3 | X0B | Eastern Nunavut | 36.8% |
| 4 | X0G | Western NWT | 32.4% |
| 5 | J0M | Nunavik, QC | 30.4% |
| 6 | M4X | Toronto (Cabbagetown/Regent Park) | 29.8% |
| 7 | X0A | Western Nunavut | 29.5% |
| 8 | M3N | Toronto (Jane-Finch) | 29.1% |
| 9 | M9N | Toronto (Weston) | 28.5% |
| 10 | L6G | Brampton (Downtown) | 28.2% |
Torncliffe Park (M4H) surpasses even Nunavut for core housing need at 41.2 percent — a single high-rise neighbourhood in Toronto's inner suburbs where recent immigrant families crowd into aging apartment towers paying rents that consume most of their income. The northern territories (X0C, X0B, X0G, X0A, J0M) face a different crisis: there are simply not enough dwellings, and the cost of building new ones in the Arctic is five to ten times the southern Canadian average. The Toronto codes (M4X Regent Park, M3N Jane-Finch, M9N Weston) represent the city's most disadvantaged neighbourhoods, where subsidized housing waitlists stretch beyond a decade.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population. Riding boundaries reflect the 2022 Federal Electoral Districts. Adapted from Statistics Canada; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population. Adapted from Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.