Households & Families
Household size, family structure, and living arrangements. — 2021 Census of Population
Map loading...
Avg. Household Size
Average number of persons per private household
Distribution by riding
Average household size by federal riding, 2021 Census. Median 2.4 persons; range 1.6 (Spadina—Harbourfront; Vancouver Centre) to 4.3 (Brampton East); half of ridings between 2.2 and 2.6. Canada: 2.4.
Colour
- Canada 2.4
Chart loading...
Vertical axis: Average household size (persons)
Each dot is one federal riding (343 with a figure; 2023 Representation Order), placed by its value and spread across the axis so that dots do not overlap. The line marks the value for Canada as a whole (2.4). Prairies: Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Atlantic: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. North: Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population.
Highest and lowest ridings
Average household size by federal riding, 2021 Census. 343 ridings ranked from highest (1) to lowest; tied values share a rank. Bars start at zero on one scale; the vertical line marks the value for Canada (2.4).
10 highest
| Rank | Riding | Bar | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brampton EastON | 4.3 | |
| 2 | Brampton WestON | 3.9 | |
| 3 | Brampton North—CaledonON | 3.7 | |
| 3 | Brampton SouthON | 3.7 | |
| 3 | NunavutNU | 3.7 | |
| 6 | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill RiverSK | 3.5 | |
| 7 | Calgary McKnightAB | 3.4 | |
| 7 | Markham—ThornhillON | 3.4 | |
| 7 | Mississauga—MaltonON | 3.4 | |
| 7 | Surrey NewtonBC | 3.4 |
10 lowest
| Rank | Riding | Bar | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 342 | Spadina—HarbourfrontON | 1.6 | |
| 342 | Vancouver CentreBC | 1.6 | |
| 339 | Laurier—Sainte-MarieQC | 1.7 | |
| 339 | Québec CentreQC | 1.7 | |
| 339 | Toronto CentreON | 1.7 | |
| 336 | Calgary CentreAB | 1.8 | |
| 336 | Rosemont—La Petite-PatrieQC | 1.8 | |
| 336 | Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-SoeursQC | 1.8 | |
| 329 | University—RosedaleON | 1.9 | |
| 329 | VictoriaBC | 1.9 |
All 343 ridings, ranked
Value: Average number of persons per private household. Riding names link to the riding's dissemination-area map for this topic.
Households & Families — 2021 Census
Auto generated. Flag an issue.Households & Families in Canada
Canada counted nearly 15 million private households in the 2021 Census of Population, a 6.1 percent increase from 2016 even as the average number of people per household continued to shrink. The household topic maps four metrics — average household size, the share of couple families, lone-parent families, and people living alone — that together reveal how family structure varies by region, urbanization, and culture across the country.
Average Household Size
The national average in 2021 was 2.4 persons per household, continuing a century-long decline from 4.2 in 1931. But that average masks dramatic geographic variation visible on the map.
The largest households in Canada cluster in Brampton and the western GTA suburbs: Brampton East leads all federal ridings at 4.3 persons per household, followed by Brampton West (3.9) and Brampton North (3.6). These ridings are home to large South Asian immigrant communities where multigenerational living is common. At the postal-code level, FSA L6P (northwest Brampton) mirrors this at 4.3, with over 91,000 residents. Northern and Indigenous communities also stand out — Nunavut averages 3.7 and FSA R0B in northern Manitoba reaches 4.1.
At the other extreme, downtown cores have the smallest households. Laurier–Sainte-Marie, Québec, Spadina–Fort York, Toronto Centre, and Vancouver Centre all average just 1.7 persons per household. Downtown Victoria (FSA V8W) is the national low at 1.4. These areas are dominated by studio and one-bedroom apartments occupied by young professionals and retirees.
Couple Families
Nationally, 64.6 percent of census families were married couples in 2021, with another 19 percent living common-law — making Canada the G7 leader in common-law unions, a trend driven overwhelmingly by Quebec. Together, couple families account for roughly 84 percent of all census families.
The highest couple-family rates are found in rural prairie and southwestern Ontario ridings: Cypress Hills–Grasslands (90.2%), Provencher (89.7%), and Carleton (89.1%). The lowest rates appear in Northern and Indigenous ridings — Churchill–Keewatinook Aski (64.5%), Desnethé–Missinippi–Churchill River (65.8%), and Nunavut (66.9%) — as well as in urban ridings with high immigration and socioeconomic challenges like Humber River–Black Creek (65.0%) and York South–Weston (68.9%).
Lone-Parent Families
One-parent families made up 16.4 percent of all census families nationally. The map highlights a clear north-south gradient: Nunavut and northern ridings in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Quebec have lone-parent rates above 30 percent, while rural southern ridings sit below 12 percent.
Churchill–Keewatinook Aski tops the riding list at 35.5 percent lone-parent families, followed by Humber River–Black Creek (35.0%) and Desnethé–Missinippi–Churchill River (34.2%). At the FSA level, the Jane-Finch neighbourhood in Toronto (M3N) has the highest rate among populated postal codes at 42.4 percent, followed by northern Manitoba (R0B, 41.7%) and Nunavik in northern Quebec (J0M, 39.6%). Lone-parent prevalence correlates strongly with lower household income and higher housing-cost burden, making this metric a useful cross-reference with the income and housing census topics.
Living Alone
The 2021 Census recorded 4.4 million Canadians living alone — 15 percent of all adults, the highest share on record. One-person households are now the most common household type in Canada, accounting for 29.3 percent of all households, ahead of couples with children and couples without children (each about 25 percent).
Quebec dominates the top of the living-alone rankings. The ten ridings with the highest share of non-family persons living alone are all in Quebec, led by Mégantic–L’Érable (85.3%), Montmagny–L’Islet–Kamouraska–Rivière-du-Loup (83.6%), and Bellechasse–Les Etchemins–Lévis (83.4%). This reflects both Quebec’s cultural acceptance of solo living and its older demographic profile in rural regions.
Conversely, the lowest living-alone rates are found in the same immigrant-heavy suburban ridings that have the largest households: Brampton East (11.7%), Brampton West (15.4%), and Brampton North (22.4%). At the FSA level, L6P in Brampton has the national low at 12.0 percent.
Population aging is the primary driver of this trend. Among Canadians aged 85 and over, 42 percent live alone, compared with just 7 percent of 20-to-24-year-olds. As the baby boom generation ages, the share of one-person households is projected to continue rising, with implications for housing demand, health care, and urban planning.
Riding Rankings
The tables below rank all 338 federal ridings by household structure. Two patterns emerge immediately: the largest-household list is dominated by GTA suburbs and Northern ridings, while the smallest-household list reads like a directory of Canadian downtown cores. The gap between the extremes is stark — a household in Brampton East is on average 2.5 times the size of one in Laurier–Sainte-Marie.
Largest Households (by Riding)
| Rank | Riding | Avg. Size |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brampton East | 4.3 |
| 2 | Brampton West | 3.9 |
| 3 | Nunavut | 3.7 |
| 4 | Brampton North | 3.6 |
| 5 | Calgary Skyview | 3.4 |
| 6 | Surrey–Newton | 3.4 |
| 7 | King–Vaughan | 3.3 |
| 8 | Markham–Thornhill | 3.3 |
| 9 | Milton | 3.3 |
| 10 | Mississauga–Malton | 3.3 |
Seven of the top ten are in the Greater Toronto Area. The common thread is large immigrant populations — primarily South Asian in Brampton and East Asian in Markham — where extended-family households are the cultural norm. Nunavut is the exception: overcrowded housing rather than cultural preference drives its high average, with the territory facing a chronic housing shortage.
Smallest Households (by Riding)
| Rank | Riding | Avg. Size |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laurier–Sainte-Marie | 1.7 |
| 2 | Québec | 1.7 |
| 3 | Spadina–Fort York | 1.7 |
| 4 | Toronto Centre | 1.7 |
| 5 | Vancouver Centre | 1.7 |
| 6 | Rosemont–La Petite-Patrie | 1.8 |
| 7 | Ville-Marie–Le Sud-Ouest–Île-des-Sœurs | 1.8 |
| 8 | Calgary Centre | 1.8 |
| 9 | Beauport–Limoilou | 1.9 |
| 10 | Hochelaga | 1.9 |
Five ridings tie at the bottom at 1.7, and four of the bottom ten are in Québec — reflecting the province’s high rates of solo living and low birth rates. Every riding on this list contains a major city’s downtown core, where the housing stock is overwhelmingly apartments and condos built for one- and two-person households.
Highest Lone-Parent Rate (by Riding)
| Rank | Riding | Lone-Parent % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Churchill–Keewatinook Aski | 35.5% |
| 2 | Humber River–Black Creek | 35.0% |
| 3 | Desnethé–Missinippi–Churchill River | 34.2% |
| 4 | Nunavut | 33.2% |
| 5 | York South–Weston | 31.1% |
| 6 | Bourassa | 30.4% |
| 7 | Etobicoke North | 28.5% |
| 8 | Sydney–Victoria | 27.2% |
| 9 | Edmonton Griesbach | 26.5% |
| 10 | Winnipeg Centre | 25.9% |
This list splits into two distinct groups. The Northern and Indigenous ridings (Churchill–Keewatinook Aski, Desnethé–Missinippi, Nunavut) have high lone-parent rates tied to systemic factors — housing instability, limited economic opportunity, and the intergenerational effects of the residential school system. The urban ridings (Humber River–Black Creek, York South–Weston, Bourassa, Etobicoke North) are among Canada’s lowest-income ridings, where lone-parent prevalence tracks closely with poverty and housing affordability stress.
Highest Living Alone Rate (by Riding)
| Rank | Riding | Living Alone % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mégantic–L’Érable | 85.3% |
| 2 | Montmagny–L’Islet–Kamouraska–Rivière-du-Loup | 83.6% |
| 3 | Bellechasse–Les Etchemins–Lévis | 83.4% |
| 4 | Beauce | 83.2% |
| 5 | Lac-Saint-Jean | 83.0% |
| 6 | Avignon–La Mitis–Matane–Matapédia | 82.8% |
| 7 | Rimouski-Neigette–Témiscouata–Les Basques | 82.6% |
| 8 | Saint-Maurice–Champlain | 82.1% |
| 9 | Louis-Saint-Laurent | 81.8% |
| 10 | Richmond–Arthabaska | 81.8% |
The entire top ten is in rural and small-city Quebec. These are not downtown-condo ridings — they are aging regions where younger residents have moved to Montréal or Québec City, leaving behind an older population that increasingly lives alone after the death of a spouse. The pattern highlights how population aging manifests differently across regions: in cities, solo living is a lifestyle choice; in rural Quebec, it is more often a consequence of demographic decline.
Postal Code (FSA) Rankings
FSA-level data reveals patterns that riding-level boundaries can blur. Postal codes are smaller and more socially homogeneous, so the extremes are sharper. At the top, Brampton’s L-prefix codes dominate even more decisively than in the riding view; at the bottom, individual downtown neighbourhoods emerge that might be averaged away within a larger riding.
Largest Households (by FSA)
| Rank | FSA | Area | Avg. Size | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L6P | Brampton NW | 4.3 | 91,155 |
| 2 | R0B | Northern Manitoba | 4.1 | 42,205 |
| 3 | L6R | Brampton SE | 4.0 | 93,784 |
| 4 | M1X | Scarborough (Agincourt) | 4.0 | 14,810 |
| 5 | X0C | Nunavut | 4.0 | 11,027 |
| 6 | L7A | Brampton (Gore Rd.) | 3.9 | 104,009 |
| 7 | J0M | Nunavik, QC | 3.8 | 25,104 |
| 8 | L5W | Mississauga (Malton) | 3.8 | 24,145 |
| 9 | L3S | Markham | 3.7 | 55,403 |
| 10 | L4T | Mississauga (Malton) | 3.6 | 38,182 |
The FSA view confirms that Brampton is not just a city of large households — it is overwhelmingly so. Four of the top ten postal codes are Brampton L-codes, with a combined population of over 380,000. R0B (northern Manitoba First Nations) and X0C (Nunavut communities) represent the Northern dimension of large households, while J0M covers the Inuit communities of Nunavik in northern Quebec. Notably, L7A (Brampton’s Gore Road corridor) is the single largest FSA on this list at 104,000 residents.
Smallest Households (by FSA)
| Rank | FSA | Area | Avg. Size | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | V8W | Downtown Victoria | 1.4 | 6,459 |
| 2 | G1R | Old Québec City | 1.5 | 16,423 |
| 3 | K2P | Ottawa (Centretown) | 1.5 | 18,825 |
| 4 | M4Y | Toronto (Church-Wellesley) | 1.5 | 36,319 |
| 5 | T2R | Calgary (Beltline) | 1.5 | 17,743 |
| 6 | T5J | Downtown Edmonton | 1.5 | 6,288 |
| 7 | T5K | Edmonton (Oliver) | 1.5 | 22,440 |
| 8 | G1K | Québec City (St-Roch) | 1.6 | 18,911 |
| 9 | G1N | Québec City (Limoilou) | 1.6 | 8,400 |
| 10 | H2X | Montréal (Plateau) | 1.6 | 21,548 |
Unlike the riding list, the FSA view shows that tiny households are a truly national phenomenon — every major city’s downtown appears. Victoria’s V8W stands alone at 1.4, the only postal code in Canada where the average household is smaller than 1.5 persons. Québec City places three FSAs in the bottom ten (G1R, G1K, G1N), reinforcing its position as one of the most solo-living-oriented cities in the country. Toronto’s M4Y (Church-Wellesley Village) is the most populated FSA on this list at over 36,000 residents, suggesting that small-household living at scale is viable and desirable in the right urban context.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population. Adapted from Statistics Canada; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population. Adapted from Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.