Stephen Harper the Quebecer

The next Prime Minister of Canada should come from Quebec and he should be Stephen Harper. This statement may not seem to make much sense at first but I believe that it would represent a brilliant strategic move by the Conservatives to form the next government.

After a week of secret tapes and bribes, let’s have some fun and consider an unlikely yet interesting scenario: Stephen Harper the Quebecer. Allow me to propose some ‘outside the box’ type of thinking…

Stephen Harper should immediately move to the province of Quebec and reside in the riding of Louis-Saint-Laurent from which he should run for its seat in the next federal election. The riding of Louis-Saint-Laurent is the most ‘winnable’ riding in Quebec for the Conservative Party of Canada. While Stephen Harper is not in Ottawa, he should be in Quebec, he should enroll his children in a school there and he should join its PTA.

“What on Earth could this hope to accomplish”, you might ask? The Conservative Party of Canada needs to make a splash in Quebec, and it needs to do so in a big way. It needs to do so not necessarily for electoral success in that province, but for electoral success in Ontario. There could be no greater expressions of outreach, backed up by the perceived risk of incredible personal failure, than by packing the moving van and moving the family to la belle province and by running for election there.

Canadians, and indeed Quebecers would question this apparent political suicide. And then they would come to a realization that Stephen Harper would be going for broke. Many in the party believe that Stephen Harper will step aside if the Conservatives lose another election campaign. Running in Quebec represents a net advantage for national Conservative electoral fortunes. What would be Mr. Harper’s former riding of Calgary Southwest is safe for the CPC. The party and Harper’s significant gesture of outreach in Quebec would only serve to increase vote totals in that province, in Atlantic Canada, and in Ontario. There are only two scenarios in the next federal election: a Conservative win or a Conservative loss. A Conservative loss would likely see the exit of Mr. Harper from federal politics. A Conservative win and a Harper loss would see an immediate Alberta byelection for Stephen Harper to regain MP status in the House of Commons.

Prior to the election, the Conservative Party should outline what I believe to be its two greatest strengths within the framework of Canadian federalism: its unfettered commitment to the resolution of the fiscal imbalance and its promise for greater provincial respect. I believe that the issue of uncertainty of our national unity has been borne in the failure of the federal Liberal Party on these two issues. Look to Alberta, look to Newfoundland, and of course, look to Quebec for testaments. Jean Charest has been lamenting the fiscal imbalance since he became Premier of that province. His fellow Quebecers who believe in Canada (and even those voters that do not) know that it’s the contemptuous attitude from Ottawa that has poisoned the well for as long as many can remember. Alberta and Quebec are mutually maligned in this respect and Harper’s move from the former to the latter would accent this to the point where it could even define the entire election campaign.

Paul Martin is from Windsor Ontario but he claims to be a Quebecer and a few people actually believe him. Stephen Harper is from the West and it’s safe to say that nobody, at first glance would believe that he’s a Quebecer. However, if Mr. Harper reached out to Quebec by running for a seat there and if he reached out in the context of Alberta’s shared common experience of fiscal contempt from Ottawa, Mr. Harper, styled after Kennedy’s 1963 speech from Berlin could proclaim in Montreal, “Je suis Quebecois” and many more would believe him.

Yes, Stephen Harper would definitely be a fish out of water, yet many Quebecers would come to appreciate that he’s very much one of them.

To win an election, one must define it. The Conservative Party should commission a poll in Quebec that simply asks if the Liberal party has done more to help or to hurt national unity. The answer will likely surprise people from Ontario. Stephen Harper should then run the Tory campaign, and indeed define the election, on national unity (everyone will understand Adcam as the subtext). This may win enough seats in Ontario to win at least a minority Conservative government. Its time to pull out all the stops and this idea might be radical enough to make the difference.

Grewal tapes spliced?

Tonight there are allegations from the Liberals that the tapes are spliced and doctored to make the attempted bribery of Gurmant Grewal seem… um… a lot… worse?

You can’t blame the Liberal spin though; this is a logical path to take while running damage control. First they painted Conservatives as secretive for recording conversations, then they try to point out that wiretapping might be illegal, then allegations of poor translation, then complaints of incomplete disclosure of the full four hours, then claims of that the tapes are inaudible, then they bring up the suspicion of doctoring.

The Liberal spin-machine is working overtime and only doing its job. You’d almost blame them if they didn’t try.

But what’s next?

Perhaps the next Liberal strategy is to claim that rebroadcast of the tapes doesn’t conform to CRTC standards or that the bribes aren’t in both official languages…

UPDATE: CQ has more here and here

Wow, did Peter Mackay just ask my question?

I’m watching CPAC’s broadcast of Question Period and Peter Mackay just stood up and outlined the CTV broadcast and the conflicting accounts of the RCMP commissioner and the PMO concerning an RCMP investigation of Grewal-gate. He went on to ask if the PMO was interfering in the business of the RCMP.

From my post this morning titled “CTV Newsreel – PMO Contradicts Top Mountie”:

RCMP investigation? Dosanjh is under the impression that it’s underway, so does Guiliano Zaccardelli, the RCMP Commissioner. The PMO says, “talk to our more senior RCMP guy, he says there isn’t an investigation”. Huh? Bob Fife seems to look just as confused as I do.

I certainly hope that the Prime Minister isn’t talking about manipulating the Minister of Public Safety through her cabinet job. Is the RCMP the latest institution to experience further corruption by the Liberals? This would be my question in Question Period today. Won’t someone ask this concerned citizen’s question?

Here are Peter Mackay’s questions in Question Period:

Mr. Peter MacKay (Central Nova, CPC): The fact, Mr. Speaker, is some did.

Last night CTV television reported that the RCMP had launched an investigation into the corrupt deal making efforts of the Prime Minister. Then the station received a call from the Prime Minister’s Office saying that the RCMP was only reviewing the complaints and further questions would be directed to the RCMP.

How did they know in the PMO, and could the Prime Minister tell us when his communications department became the official spokesperson for the RCMP?

Hon. Anne McLellan (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, let me make it absolutely plain. No one from the Prime Minister’s Office contacted anyone in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

Mr. Peter MacKay (Central Nova, CPC): Mr. Speaker, we will just have to take their word for that. Time will tell. This is very reminiscent of the efforts to interfere with the Ethics Commissioner.

The Globe and Mail reports today that the RCMP said that it was only reviewing the complaint, only after the RCMP spokesperson, Nathalie Deschenes, told the Globe and Mail that an investigation had been launched.

Why was the police investigation suddenly downgraded to a review, and was the Prime Minister once again exercising political interference in an RCMP matter?

If Peter Mackay really asked my question in Question Period, that would make this political geek’s day.

Peter Mackay also had elements of Angry’s analysis in his question yesterday concerning the independence of the Ethics Commissioner.

Actually, as I continue to watch Question Period, Helena Guergis is asking questions along same lines regarding the independence of the Ethics Commissioner, and now Jason Kenney asking about it too.

UPDATE: Here’s the video of Mackay’s questions (check out his last two)