CBC: The Secret Mulroney Tapes

Canadians all thought the same thing when Peter C. Newman launched his book about the clandestine tapes that he made over the years in private discussions with former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.

We could all agree that Newman’s perfidious actions would be considered vile no matter one’s sentiments of the last elected Conservative Prime Minister.

Similarly, most of us shook our heads when the CBC announced their straight-to-prime-time-pre-election knock-off of the same.

Yet, as a consumer of politics (a junkie perhaps), I decided to sit down for a couple of hours with Peter C and the CBC as they took shots at Brian Mulroney.

However, as the documentary unfolded I become more and more intrigued. The CBC certainly framed Newman’s content upon Mulroney’s back-to-back majorities but at times the documentary became inquisitive of Newman’s motives and even rightly alleged that Newman had betrayed his old friend.

This was certainly the assessment of a non-political friend who was watching as well. “This documentary is making me feel sympathy for Mulroney. Newman betrayed Mulroney. His comments aren’t shocking. Everyone has opinions, so what?” Indeed, just because someone says Fuddle-duddle, does it greenlight Canadians to go negative?

Beyond the ominous background music juxtaposed with still frames of Mulroney and overexposed B&W headlines critical of the Conservatives, I was fascinated by what I was watching. Not often do we have a chance to fill in the blanks in the historical record, but Peter C. Newman, despite his treachery, has offered Canadians a first-hand point of view on history.

While Newman ultimately betrayed his old friend, I would argue that he also did him a favour as well. By releasing private conversations for public consumption he has, in essence, presented Brian Mulroney’s account of his own record, in the former Prime Minister’s own words. The conversations were private and were never meant for public performance. Since the chats were between two close friends, not many would argue that the discussions weren’t frank and honest.

Mulroney’s perceptions on a variety of topics from the Tuna “crisis” (in which he questions the over-reaction of the Opposition and the press – he notes that no one even became ill) to Meech lake and Charlottetown gave Canadians an unspun opinion.

The private and friendly conversations between the former PM and Newman were well above the rhetoric and spin reserved for the ‘hated’ Press Gallery; the conversations were genuine.

We learn for example that Mulroney believed that Meech Lake was the best deal ever offered and that Trudeau and Liberal Newfoundland Premier Clyde Wells ultimately screwed the deal for personal partisan posturing. Mulroney confided in Newman that he believed that if Meech had gone through without Liberal interference, the Quebec sovereignty issue would have ultimately been averted.

Charlottetown, according to Mulroney, was another betrayal by Wells, Chretien and by Bouchard. History may now judge that it wasn’t a lack of Mulroney’s ideological capability that caused the constitutional crisis; the Quebec sovereignty crisis was instead rooted in Liberal political posturing and in betrayal.

Ego is certainly not in short supply to those who desire Canada’s top job. It is interesting to note that it was that of Mulroney that drove him to bring Quebec into the constitution and to unite Canada at great electoral detriment to the Conservatives, while it was the ego of Chretien that attempted to manage the Quebec crisis (that he helped precipitate) to great financial benefit to the Liberals.

While historically fascinating, the CBC still released a documentary which was personally embarrassing to Conservative PM Brian Mulroney a week before a national election campaign. Consider that our national broadcaster has produced two rosy “rock-star” mini-series portrayals of Trudeau. This documentary was also produced with a remarkable turnaround time since Newman announced his book a few short months ago.

Consider this in the context of recent events. The most significant scandal in Canadian history has now been unfolding for a couple of years. The Sponsorship scandal has provided a gripping story of corruption, betrayal and criminality. I can’t wait to see the CBC’s documentary.

Pat Binns to run federally?

I’ve heard that Price Edward Island premier Pat Binns will be holding a press conference tomorrow to announce his future political plans.

Back in 1996, Binns said that he’d only be in office for 10 years. Binns caucus has been persuading him to stay on and seek a fourth and final term.

Binns’ chief of staff Peter McQuaid, however, has hinted that Binns will be stepping down. McQuaid said that if Binns is to retire, that this is the best time to do it.

So, will Pat Binns run for the Conservative Party federally instead? He’d have a good shot at securing a seat for the Tories in the province as he’s been a popular premier. Currently, the Liberals have all four seats in PEI.

The riding of Cardigan is currently open for Binns to secure its nomination.

Will he announce his intentions to do so tomorrow?

UPDATE (11/19): Looks like Pat Binns’ will stay on as PEI’s premier for a fourth and final term (he said today that he will not seek a fifth). Binns is quite a popular premier and he’ll continue to serve his constitents well.

Length of Canadian elections

Was forwarded some interesting data on Canadian elections today and I thought that I should post it here in case anyone out there in the ether is searching for questions like “How long are elections in Canada?” or “What is the length of the writ period for Canadian elections?”.

According to the Elections Canada Act, an election must be no shorter than 36 days. In more technical terms, the writ must not be issued or dated less than 36 days before polling day. This changed from 47 to 36 days in 1997.

Length of Federal Election Campaigns (1867 to date)

Between Parliaments Date
Dissolved
Election Date Length in Days of Election Campaigns

1st – 2nd

1872.07.08

1872.07.20 – 1872.10.12

2nd – 3rd

1874.01.02

1874.01.22

20

3rd – 4th

1878.08.17

1878.09.17

31

4th – 5th

1882.05.18

1882.06.20

33

5th – 6th

1887.01.15

1887.02.22

38

6th – 7th

1891.02.03

1891.03.05

30

7th – 8th

1896.04.24

1896.06.23

60

8th – 9th

1900.10.09

1900.11.07

29

9th – 10th

1904.09.29

1904.11.03

35

10th – 11th

1908.09.17

1908.10.26

39

11th – 12th

1911.07.29

1911.09.21

54

12th – 13th

1917.10.06

1917.12.17

72

13th – 14th

1921.10.04

1921.12.06

63

14th – 15th

1925.09.05

1925.10.29

54

15th – 16th

1926.07.02

1926.09.14

74

16th – 17th

1930.05.30

1930.07.28

59

17th – 18th

1935.08.14

1935.10.14

61

18th – 19th

1940.01.25

1940.03.26

61

19th – 20th

1945.04.16

1945.06.11

56

20th – 21st

1949.04.30

1949.06.27

58

21st – 22nd

1953.06.13

1953.08.10

58

22nd – 23rd

1957.04.12

1957.06.10

59

23rd – 24th

1958.02.01

1958.03.31

58

24th – 25th

1962.04.19

1962.06.18

60

25th – 26th

1963.02.06

1963.04.08

61

26th – 27th

1965.09.08

1965.11.08

61

27th – 28th

1968.04.23

1968.06.25

63

28th – 29th

1972.09.01

1972.10.30

59

29th – 30th

1974.05.09

1974.07.08

60

30th – 31st

1979.03.26

1979.05.22

57

31st – 32nd

1979.12.14

1980.02.18

66

32nd – 33rd

1984.07.09

1984.09.04

57

33rd – 34th

1988.10.01

1988.11.21

51

34th – 35th

1993.09.08

1993.10.25

47

35th – 36th

1997.04.27

1997.06.02

36

36th – 37th

2000.10.22

2000.11.27

36

37th – 38th

2004.05.23

2004.06.28

36