Liberal reboot

Yesterday, Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff announced that his party will no longer support the Conservative government in the House of Commons, thereby ramping up speculation of what would seem to be an imminent election.

But for Mr. Ignatieff, an election is his least-preferred outcome and I’d argue that the latest rhetoric isn’t indicative of a future powerplay for the Liberal leader, but rather of move to reset the Liberal message.

Michael Ignatieff hasn’t had a particularly eventful summer. In fact, the highly respected Chantal Hebert has noted that the Liberal leader was this summer season’s political loser as the man found it difficult to connect with average everyday Canadians on the hamburger circuit — despite liberal helpings of Grey Poupon.

After backing down terribly from his ultimatum without conditions in the spring on the immediate changes to employment insurance, Mr. Ignatieff declared victory when a study group was unveiled to look into the issue. But as anyone who has observed Ottawa political cynically knows, a commitment to study, is rather a move to defer and to delay. The highly partisan panel included known agitators Pierre Poilievre and Marlene Jennings, and these MPs rounded out by Minister Diane Finley and Liberal MP Michael Savage seemed more like headliners for a summer cage-match to entertain reporters looking for a story rather than a sincere effort by either party to move in any direction on EI. In a move which must have been highly disappointing for Liberal supporters, within the last week Ignatieff telegraphed his move away from his EI casus belli via Ralph Goodale.

Yesterday’s move seeks to remove the onus from the Liberals to “make Parliament work” — as the saying goes. Instead, that onus now rests upon the shoulders of the NDP and Michael Ignatieff surely expects that they will find a way to support the government. Indeed, much of the experience of being an opposition leader in a minority parliament is figuring out who is left holding the bag.

Michael Ignatieff — despite his academic credentials and reputation as a deep thinker — has underwhelmed on the policy front since he became leader of his party a few short months ago. Canadians — short of those in the Lesser Evil book club — aren’t familiar with the man and what he stands for and have only had the benefit of introduction courtesy of the Conservative Party’s Just Visiting ad spots. In politics, it is easy to differentiate oneself… by differentiating. And for Mr. Ignatieff, that will mean by opposing this government he is not likely seeking election, but rather something to put into the window for one in the future.

Today, the NDP indicated that yes, they are willing to “make Parliament work” and they submitted their list of demands.  Predictably, the Conservatives responded with a firm “no” to a wholly incompatible agenda and threw the NDP lot back with that of the Liberals and the Bloc Quebecois.

Were Ignatieff’s musings yesterday a gamechanger? Of course, that’s unclear at this point.  Pollster Nik Nanos stated that there are too many “moving parts” at this point to avoid an election.  But, if there is any lesson to be learned from Canadian politics in politics, there is no orthodoxy and a week — let alone a month — is a long time in politics.

If the Liberal objective is to reset their message, we await for the coming weeks with interest to see what the modern Liberal Party of Canada is all about.

No eventuality can be solely manipulated by Michael Ignatieff however, and the Conservatives will take this opportunity to craft their message as well.  As Michael Ignatieff is now perceived to be the instigator of a future election, the Conservatives have and will continue to cite Ignatieff’s arrogance (it’s all about him).  Further, if we do go to an election this fall it will be because all three opposition parties voted to defeat the government.  This will only serve to underline the Conservative message that minority parliaments are the cause of political instability and that a majority government is the only solution.  Conservatives will then ask Canadians to consider two options: a majority Conservative government versus a coalition of socialists, separatists and Ignatieffs.



109 thoughts on “Liberal reboot”

  1. I can not turn off my notifications and am being plagued by some the link yo
    have given to stop will not work can you stop them from your end

  2. Centigrade, a little hint which may work to stop notifications:
    Right under the boxes for comments, moniker and email address, there's the “post comment” function.
    Under that, there's a “subscribe to all comments” sign.
    Click on the up arrow so that the “do not subscribe” sign shows.
    That should stop the notifications.

  3. I think there has been a lot of ink spilled on silly ideas of what it means to “work” in parliament.

    Good performance means different things to different audiences. Even so, being the most petulant is no-one's standard.

    For the NDP, success is to make the governing party implement part of your agenda.

    (For the Bloc, it is to gain some advantage for Quebec (or make some claim of alienation). For the Liberals, success is to make the government look bad. Failing that, it is to be seen as having a superior alternative. )

    The NDP have taunted the Libs, not for voting for the Conservatives but for voting with the conservative agenda. The NDP will suffer no loss of face for voting with the conservatives so long as they can claim to have formed part of the agenda.

  4. uhhh, don't typical hand grenades explode on three seconds? So Harper would be holding the grenade when it exploded?

    Am I reading your comment correctly…or did you mean he'd throw it on the 2 count?

  5. Centigrade, I just listened to the Liberonies on the Radio saying that the stimulus money is not being used. They claim there is no infrastructure going on. How rediculus can you get. You can't drive 5 KM and run into a major construction site. From Qebec to Toronto. I guess the Liberonies don't go anywhere.

  6. Nova Dog. A coalition is the only way Iggy could become Priminister. I suspect, that is his plan.
    He must know that he cannot possibly win a majority. We would again be presented with a fact.
    Just like last time.

  7. Nova Dog. A coalition is the only way Iggy could become Priminister. I suspect, that is his plan.
    He must know that he cannot possibly win a majority. We would again be presented with a fact.
    Just like last time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *