From the pages of Nature’s Climate Change Journal
Members of the public with the highest degrees of science literacy and technical reasoning capacity were not the most concerned about climate change. Rather, they were the ones among whom cultural polarization was greatest. This result suggests that public divisions over climate change stem not from the public’s incomprehension of science but from a distinctive conflict of interest: between the personal interest individuals have in forming beliefs in line with those held by others with whom they share close ties and the collective one they all share in making use of the best available science to promote common welfare.
So here we learn that “deniers” aren’t dumb or scientifically illiterate. But one rhetorically wonders which group they refer to that suffers from a “distinctive conflict of interest” that is driven by “personal interest” that “individuals have in forming beliefs in line with those held by others with whom they share close ties.”
For deeper analysis and exclusive posts, subscribe to my Substack.
This from the peer-reviewed journal of the prestigious Nature Publishing Group.
Related Posts
Are Canadian political polls still useful?
I’ve long viewed polling as a useful but imperfect tool for gauging Canadian sentiment. It helps parties like the Conservatives under Pierre Poilievre create…
Andrew Ference heads to the Edmonton Oilers
The former unrestricted free agent and former Boston Bruin Andrew Ference has signed with the Edmonton Oilers. Ference has been a prominent celebrity voice…