Comments on: Victory in the in-and-out saga. Federal court rules for CPC. http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/ email@stephentaylor.ca Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Lovely Young http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-25759 Lovely Young Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:22:00 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-25759 It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles, but this one grabbed my attention. You’ve written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative. <a href="http://www.fujiwhara.com/affiliates/" rel="nofollow">Website Affiliate Programs</a> It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles, but this one grabbed my attention. You’ve written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative.
Website Affiliate Programs

]]> By: argie monroy http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-25758 argie monroy Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:19:00 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-25758 It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles, but this one grabbed my attention. You’ve written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative. It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles, but this one grabbed my attention. You’ve written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative.

]]> By: Lovely Young http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-25757 Lovely Young Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:17:00 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-25757 It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles, but this one grabbed my attention. You’ve written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative. <a href="http://www.fujiwhara.com/affiliates/" rel="nofollow">Website Affiliate Programs</a> It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles, but this one grabbed my attention. You’ve written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative.
Website Affiliate Programs

]]> By: Lovely Young http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-25756 Lovely Young Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:14:00 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-25756 It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles,  but this one grabbed my attention.  You have written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative. <a href="http://www.fujiwhara.com/affiliates/" rel="nofollow">Website Affiliate Programs</a> It’s a little different for me to take notice of articles,  but this one grabbed my attention.  You have written a great article. You’ve made it interesting as well as informative.
Website Affiliate Programs

]]> By: Gayle http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-13342 Gayle Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:29:55 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-13342 They did not deem them illegal. They simply said Maynard did not have the authority to withhold the payments.<br><br>Maybe if you read the case you might get it. They did not deem them illegal. They simply said Maynard did not have the authority to withhold the payments.

Maybe if you read the case you might get it.

]]> By: Beer and Popcorn http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-13341 Beer and Popcorn Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:34:19 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-13341 Gayle - why would Election's Canada make payments to caondidates for expenses which they deemed to be illegal? Gayle – why would Election's Canada make payments to caondidates for expenses which they deemed to be illegal?

]]> By: Gayle http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-11511 Gayle Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:29:55 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-11511 They did not deem them illegal. They simply said Maynard did not have the authority to withhold the payments.<br><br>Maybe if you read the case you might get it. They did not deem them illegal. They simply said Maynard did not have the authority to withhold the payments.

Maybe if you read the case you might get it.

]]> By: Beer and Popcorn http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-11509 Beer and Popcorn Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:19 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-11509 Gayle - why would Election's Canada make payments to caondidates for expenses which they deemed to be illegal? Gayle – why would Election's Canada make payments to caondidates for expenses which they deemed to be illegal?

]]> By: Gayle http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-11504 Gayle Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:07:53 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-11504 Clearly you have not read the case. May I direct you to paragraph 255, where the court declines to rule on whether the scheme is legal.<br><br>You really should try to inform yourself before you comment on such things.<br><br>As for your second point, why don't you just reread what I already said. Clearly you have not read the case. May I direct you to paragraph 255, where the court declines to rule on whether the scheme is legal.

You really should try to inform yourself before you comment on such things.

As for your second point, why don't you just reread what I already said.

]]> By: Beer and Popcorn http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2010/01/victory-in-the-in-and-out-saga-federal-court-rules-for-cpc/comment-page-1/#comment-11503 Beer and Popcorn Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:04:18 +0000 http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=2116#comment-11503 No - they interpreted a law and acted within this interpretation. <br><br>This is definately not illegal. <br><br>Gayle - how did the CBC and the Liberal$ know? Were they colluding with Election's Canada? No – they interpreted a law and acted within this interpretation.

This is definately not illegal.

Gayle – how did the CBC and the Liberal$ know? Were they colluding with Election's Canada?

]]>