hit counter script

October 2, 2009

Canadian Olympic branding and competing visions of Canada

The branding for the Canadian Olympic team was unveiled yesterday by the Hudson’s Bay Company which runs retail outlets under the Bay and Zeller’s names in Canada. The company is the official outfitter for the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Canadian team. Here’s their short video describing the brand and inspiration:

It’s a bit stirring isn’t it? But, as this is a political blog, let’s describe it in this context. For years, the Conservative Party in Canada has been trying to reset the image of Canada that had existed prior to a long-run of Liberal governments and the Conservatives have sought to push back against the rebranding of the Canadian image under that party.

There was criticism yesterday that the Canadian Olympic look and feel bore a striking resemblance to that of the governing party.


The Conservative Party logo (left), the Canadian Olympic logo (right)

First, it should be said that the Hudson’s Bay effort was completely independent of any government interference. This was confirmed by Gary Lunn, junior minister for Sport in the House of Commons yesterday in a response to a question by Vancouver Liberal MP Hedy Fry. After all, companies lobby government, it is unusual for government to lobby companies. You can see examples of other similar logos here, here, and here.

Despite the criticism about the branding similarities, and though in this case the government appears to be clear of any influence regarding HBC’s decision, the Conservatives in government have been working to recapture a certain sentiment among Canadians about their country.

That sentiment, stoked by Conservative branders, is pre-Trudeau(pian). Liberal branders would have you believe that this country was born after 1967, with the Montreal Expo, with a new red and white flag, healthcare and peacekeeping ingrained as our country’s greatest accomplishments.

Conservatives would remind Canadians that our country was born out of a pioneer spirit, hundreds of years ago, of brave individuals that carved out the wilderness and thrived in it. The Hudson’s Bay ad echoes this traditional vision of Canada.

Of Canada, Conservatives emphasize it’s history of fighting for King and country through early wars in Africa in the late nineteenth century and in Europe in the first great war. As Conservatives, we remember and acknowledge that we answered the call among nations to fight tyranny and totalitarianism in the second world war. Today, we recognize that the peace cannot be kept if it is not first made.

Our vision of Canada is one of individual determination and achievement over mushy collectivism. It was roughneck young explorers that mapped out the great expanse in the northwest of our country in search of new capitalist opportunities in fur, timber, ore and minerals.

The incremental rebranding of Canada by today’s government is not accidental. From the more organic maple leaf that adorns the header of every government of Canada website, replacing a more statist institutionalized version, to the rebranding of our armed forces to emphasize the role of the forces as not only the sharp end of the spear, but razorwire for troubled times rather than simply a career building opportunity, the Conservatives have made deliberate effort to remind Canadians of this more independent and rugged version of ourselves.

Under the Harper Conservatives, Canada’s image is emphasized as “the true North strong and free”, a country that defends and maintains its northern sovereignty rather than one that panders to a more European, globalized kid glove approach.

Michael Ignatieff has returned to Canada after quite some time abroad. A potential platform plank that he has been emphasizing is the regaining of Canada’s place on the world stage. In a speech to the Canadian Club of Ottawa, he spoke with a tone a wistfulness for those times when, well, the world was different:

Multilateralism was the Canadian mantra. In 1956, Lester Pearson found a way out of the Suez Crisis and made peacekeeping our vocation. When he won the Nobel Peace Prize the next year, the Nobel committee said “he’d saved the world.” We cheered.

In the post-war era, we became the world’s leading peacekeepers. Up to 1988, there was not a single mission that we didn’t join. At the same time, we went to war in Korea, the Persian Gulf and Kosovo. We went to war when we had to. We kept the peace when we could. Blue helmets became an emblem of our identity. — Michael Ignatieff

Before one can regain their footing, one must survey the new ground. Michael Ignatieff is not ignorant to the new challenges that the world has faced since Pearson. He’s done the heavy thinking on the new role of the world’s remaining superpower and its place on the world stage. However, one surmises that the former academic is in need of the same deep reflection when it comes to Canada’s maturation on the world stage since the Suez crisis, let alone 9/11. One fears that instead of deep academic and analytical reflection on the topic, his new position as a politician has driven him to a knee-jerk, easy but antiquated Liberal view of Canada. Since he left, Canada’s role on the world stage has evolved and matured from the euphemistic “honest broker” to a respected decision-making voice that is sought after for advice and respected for its decisiveness. Canada is again a country that does the heavy lifting.

Despite our history and place earned from taming our own wilderness through sharp wit instead of the welfare tit, despite our nation’s proud history of our young men and women stepping up up for King and country, in the time post-Pearson era Liberals rebranded this country. Expo 67 was promoted as “Canada’s introduction to the world”, as we were recast into the role of confident but newly innocent debutante ready to walk on the world stage if only to give a proper and elegant wave.

Today, Canada finds itself changed, but somehow familiar. Canada grew up long before Pierre Elliott Trudeau declared its birth. Though we were recast as a global ingenue by successive Liberal governments that had us play the stoically unsung middle “nuanced” power, when Canada hosts the world in Vancouver 2010, it will do so with its regained voice and identity.

This entry was authored by Stephen Taylor at 03:53 PM | Tweet this | Add a comment
| Feedback | #
  • Name
    Hi All, just landed here via YouTube.

    to avoid using a "c" based icon - how do you politicos' suggest spelling Canada?

    HBC was around long before the Conservative Party....and I suppose if you really hate it, perhaps Eatons has something better to offer....oh. I forgot. Well, Simpsons then? darn it.....I'm no Capitalist - shit there is that damn C again........thank god this blog won't let me post a maple leaf.....I'd hate to infer all kinds of bs that was never intended by using a symbol that was created to inspire pride in our nation and our accomplishments and more importanlty under funded athletes that spend their whole life to make us all proud when the world comes to play in our backyard....a blue C a black C, red C.....a maple leaf left, centre or right - this isn't about resemblences, positioning or politics. this about putting our best foot forward and supporting our men and women who devote themselves to giving all of us something to be proud of.
  • dbenoit
    This country may have been created by explorers, but we cannot forget the importance of our more recent history. The Conservatives should not try to ignore these significant events that have helped to shape our country just because they occurred under Liberal power. Though the olympic logo was made independently from the government, the government always influences how companies advertise their products. The 2010 olympics should show all parts of Canada's past, not just the part the Conservatives want to show.
  • Kelly Jamieson
    If the Trudeau modification of the old Canada image really happened 42 years ago (beginning with expo 67) you have to consider that most Canadians have spent the majority of their lives viewing Canada in that "new" image.
    If you are saying that the Liberals broke something the Conservatives are now trying to fix, it's not justifiable at this point. Conservatives are now the ones trying to modify the image of a nation that has existed for a large majority of the large majority (if not entirety) of Canadians lives'. Do you see the hypocrisy in your argument now?
  • Kelly Jamieson
    If the Trudeau modification of the old Canada image really happened 42 years ago (beginning with expo 67) you have to consider that most Canadians have spent the majority of their lives viewing Canada in that "new" image.
    If you are saying that the Liberals broke something the Conservatives are now trying to fix, it's not justifiable at this point. Conservatives are now the ones trying to modify the image of a nation that has existed for a large majority of the large majority (if not entirety) of Canadians lives'. Do you see the hypocrisy in your argument now?
  • terry1
    Pearson gave us our flag which Harpo would love to change to a blue Maple Leaf. Trudeau gave us our homeland so to speak by repatriating our constitution. I beleive he would have gone the distance had Quebec fully cooperated and dumped the GG role as well.

    Both those events, the flag and the constitution, are what drives our pride of Country today and harpo would definitely like to change those symbols somehow.
  • Tony
  • p.f.
    As someone raised to hate the Montreal Canadiens, I resent the similarity of the Olympic logo to the C-H crest.
  • terry1
    As someone who knows a winner and is a great Habs fan I'd say you are supporting another loser in the reformatorts.
  • Kyle H
    This post here, is one of the reasons I dislike the current incarnation of the Conservative Party of Canada.

    Regardless of the logo gaffe which, while amusing, doesn't matter at all and probably has nothing to do with the Conservatives, this talk about how Liberals think Canada was born after Pearson and Trudeau - it is bullcrap. Utter, complete, bullcrap, and I hope that you're simply not looking far enough into the Liberals, rather than lying through your teeth, Mr. Taylor.

    May I remind you that one of the highest honours of the Liberal Party is to be a Laurier Club member. Why? Is it because they donate a lot? Well, yes, but also because it invokes the name of one of the greatest Prime Ministers in Canadian history, Wilfred Laurier - a Liberal that came long before Trudeau, and is a personal hero of Mr. Ignatieff and many Liberals.

    May I also remind you that Liberals, like any Canadian, recognizes the vision of those early frontier leaders and Prime Ministers, whether it was John. A Macdonald, Laurier, Brown, Howe, Tupper - they're all respected and recognized in our history as those that drove our nation forward, by one and all.

    So for you to sit there and type that out, claiming that Liberals don't care about the past, don't understand the old traditions of Canada, is just so utterly irresponsible, its almost amazing. As a Liberal that actually likes some of your posts, Mr. Taylor, I'm thoroughly disappointed by this.
  • Kingston
    Kyle, Well thought out and written debate, I think the point you might not be taking into consideration is the talking points of the LPC and their own grass roots limited view of the history of the country. They in most debates and arguments, have a habit of falling back to a limited view of the history of this country and again in my humble opinion tend to debate fwd of the Pearson and Trudeau eras saying in summation that is when Canada became progressive and socially just thus I believe that is the premise for Stephen's submission.
    The LPC of this day still believes that PET was the greatest thing from the invention of sliced bread even though the social policies and economic policies that he enacted have had long ranging determental effects on even present day life in Canada. I offer for argument, During the deficit years of PMBM years, it is a understood fact that the deficit that was being run at the time was to service the interest payments on the debt that PMPT left to the country. His social policies were all over the place and his multiculturalism adventure is still being felt to this moment with multiple enclaves of minorities sub communities existing in our major urban and for that matter in our minor urban centers rather then the tried and true assimilation. The problems rising from this are vast and leads to political pandering to ethnics groups as an example. I wish to clearly state, I have no problem with any person or group maintaining their own religious beliefs, or sexual preferences, on that one PET was right, with the state has no business in the bedrooms of the nations but I do wish that people would remember, they are Canadian first and do away with they hyphens.
  • terry1
    Kingston, you, and others, seem to forget the profound changes the baby boomers were inflicting on our society when PET became PM. These are the new seniors of today, the biggest population bulge ever seen in our country. The need for new schools, roads, housing, and many other social services was dramatic it its almost sudden need. The deficits of the day were absolutely necessary and planners knew the BB'ers would eventually enter the the work force and have to pay back those investments of the time. BM in his own way expanded on the social themes PET created, and he like Harpo, had a visceral hatred of things Liberal but other than Meech lake he never trampled on PET's social agenda.

    Harper's agenda is lot different than BM's however.

    The "hippie" era was also upon us with peoples morals changing and Trudeau met those expectations. Nowhere was this more dramatic than in Quebec where RC's simply stopped going to church ad it happened overnight.

    PET wasn't perfect by any means but he sure led the nation and led it well. I believe the lifstyles we have today are part of his legacy. We became a Country that wanted to accomplish things and we faced many many issues along the way.
  • Kingston
    Terry1, With the exception of your inability to refrain from utilizing derogatory nick names for PMSH that was the most well thought out response you have posted in a while. Well Done. The cool part of human nature is the ability of two people to look at the same events in history and come to different conclusion on their effect in history.

    My first rebuttal to your argument is your statement "We became a Country that wanted to accomplish things ..." This country accomplished many great things before the time of PMPET as it has since his time in office. Vimy Ridge, WWII, Korea, NATO membership and the Suez Canal Crisis on the international stage, and the St. Lawrence Seaway, the Canal Systems for the great lakes, and the Railroad System and Trans- Canada Highway internally. These events contribute greatly and continue to define Canada's place in the world as a country that would back up its beliefs and could be depended on to support it values and interests as well as demonstrating our ability to grow and support our population domestically.

    It is my belief that the degrading of Canada's Military, and other organization within the govt by PMPET in his quest for a social utopia hurt our place in the world and did nothing to enhance our reputation. With the possible exception of directly after WWII, Canada has and it is recognized, never been able to defend her vast borders with our small population without the help of our allies, mainly the United States but fellow NATO partners as well. My first challenge to you is to tell me what PET accomplished with the exception of the re-patting of the Constitution and the Charter that enhanced Canada's place in the world.

    As to your theory concerning the B-Boomer's, I direct you to your demographics, the infrastructure for the Boomers was for the most part put into place in the late fifties and through out the sixties. I challenge you to provide examples of any great infrastructure project brought forth through PET time in office. I am at the tail end of the boomers generation and the world was blessed with my presence in the early sixties and the schools and highways etc were already here. If there is to be another strain from our generations ( I am assuming) it will be taking place now or in the near future as we retire and begin to withdraw more from the social services network then we contribute in taxes at this time.

    An argument could be made that PET's totally ignoring of the rural sections of the country could be a huge contributive factor to the infrastructure demands made on our urban areas as well as the totally free for all on immigration.

    As much as I am enjoying this conversation, real life is calling meaning as we all know, the wife has a list of "accomplishments to be " that I must attend to. LOL
  • terry1
    Bravo Kyle, but you will now experience the right wing wrath. I think Trudeau was a great PM but get hammered by these angry Tory types whenever I mention his many accomplishments.

    .
  • Hi Stephen,

    The examples of logos that you gave don't give me a sense that the companies attached are associated with the Conservative Party. There is nothing wrong with any entity having blue and red colours that includes some stylized C. Unless the Hudson's Bay company test marketed the current logo and found that conservative people were more likely to buy their outfits, I will predict that this logo could be a public relations setback. You see, I wouldn't buy clothing with this logo because it does look like the Conservative Party logo. I also think that the logo looks plain ugly even though it is supposed to look nostalgic.

    In BC's voting reform referendum on STV, the colours of the pro-STV logo included a big dose of orange. While the logo looked nice, the colours reminded some voters of the NDP. If someone were a staunch BC Liberal supporter, the orange STV colour would have turned that person away from voting for STV. Nevermind that some of the most ardent opponents of STV were NDPers themselves. Perceptions sometimes matter more than reality.
  • Gabby in QC
    Well done, Stephen. I particularly like this paragraph, as it reminds us of Canada's valiant past.
    "Of Canada, Conservatives emphasize it’s history of fighting for King and country through early wars in Africa in the late nineteenth century and in Europe in the first great war. As Conservatives, we remember and acknowledge that we answered the call among nations to fight tyranny and totalitarianism in the second world war. Today, we recognize that the peace cannot be kept if it is not first made."

    BTW, I just happened to see the ad "We were made for this" in French, and it's just as stirring.

    What's with Martha Hall Findlay's and Hedy Fry's obsession with national colours and Olympic logos?
    If those are the pressing problems facing Canada, I'd say we are in pretty good shape, eh?
    ========
    Yesterday, after Fry's little outburst in QP, I wrote this play on colour words and posted it at Susan Delacourt's. She did not deem it worthy of publication, so I submit it here. OK, so it's not high art, but I had fun doing it. Here goes.

    It came out of the blue ...

    Today in the House the Liberals saw red, angered by the Olympic team logo, which they claim resembles the Conservative Party logo.

    The Finance Minister added to their ire when he read the latest IMF report, which states “Canada is on track to lead the world's wealthiest countries out of recession next year, a testament to sound economic policy and weak competition …”
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-busine...
    It goes without saying that the Finance Minister was tickled-pink to read such a glowing report.

    The Liberals shouted and pointed fingers, bellowed and fumed until they were blue in the face.

    They accused the NDP of being yellow-bellied for refusing to bring down the government.

    The non-confidence vote took place. Notably absent was Liberal MP Denis Coderre, presently the black sheep of the Liberal family. He’s still browned-off because his leader countermanded his decision on the Outremont candidature.

    Once the non-confidence votes were tallied, the Harper Government received the green light to continue governing, at least for the time being. I wonder if the PM was humming this at the time: http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=2786

    IMO, the Liberals lost a golden opportunity to show a little class. Imagine! Whining about the design of the Olympic Team’s attire!

    Orange you glad you live in Canada, where the design of a logo is the pressing problem of the day?
  • Omanator
    Gaby when you have nothing worthwhile to say, as is the case with Heddy Fry, you shop around for the impossible nonsense.
  • terry1
    It appears that Big City Lib has uncovered a cover up on wafegate. Interesting stuff about harpo the liar!!!
  • Kingston
    Really Terry1, If he had something he has removed it. Is it possible that you could get even the passing of info that you have nothing to do with correct.
  • JDot
    Wow...

    Awesome post Stephen..

    PS:Fantastic ad, by HBC. If you are a CPC,Liberal, NDP or even Bloc, supporter you have to like that HBC ad..
  • Bec
    I think anyone making hay of this, needs to get a life! I am so very ashamed of those Canadian politicians, journalists and otherwise that have seen fit to politicize a non event.

    As far as I am concerned, any accusation made outside of the HoC by any party is worthy of a stern warning via a defamation suit.
    This garbage absolutely must not be tolerated and the media needs to quit sucking in those that they wish to and can, manipulate.
  • Jen
    Bec, did you hear Rutherford this morning OCT2, man he was furious and rightly so.
    I just wish that Peter Kent a former news caster would just do the job for the conservatives.
    In other words since the national media refuses to report the accomplishments and international praises which our prime minister and our country canada recieved. Peter Kent a former journalist will do the job that is after the national media have done their reporting.
    Peter will come on at the next hour or so and start his show " Canadians here's what the national media would not tell you......

    This will shock the nation and most likely Peter will get very high ratings.
  • Bec
    Hi Jen, yes I did catch Rutherford and as the Grama of 'future olympians' as we call them here in Calgary, I have not been a good one to comment to much because this disgusting behaviour became very personal for me.

    What is this program that you are referring to? I hope that you can respond before it happens!
  • Jen
    What I was suggesting that whenever the liberal pundits or hosts have their hour of discussions which you and I well know is pure nonesense and constant acccusation and refusal to report ( the conservative accomplishment and the things the prime minister did for this country both here and abroad), Peter Kent could come on at a later hour to reveal to canadians the accomplishments of the conservatives.

    I was just suggesting that Peter kent do what Glenn Beck does for his countrymen- tell the real story.
  • Omanator
    Jen, A marvelous idea.
  • Fat Tony
    I think the new Olympic crest is closer to the Canadian Forces Roundel than anything else.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RCAF-Roundel.svg
  • Jane Harris Zsovan
    I agree, but I've found quite a few Conservatives also try to rewrite history and do not honour our place in the Commonwealth. Some 'rednecks' spend as much time 'erasing' history they don't like as some Liberals did. (not all Liberals are into social engineering or erasing history, nor are all NDPs.) I object as much to so called 'Conservatives' who mock the tradition and work of the Father of Confederation. (Macdonald managed to create nation and re-vision an empire, along with Galt and Cartier, while chained to an addiction.) Can't count the number of times I've run into rednecks who hate the Queen, want to leave the Commonwealth (dumb idea even from a trade perspective) hate the East, hate Quebecois, want to Americanize institutions, and dream of selling out our resources at rock bottom price. Since I write for Christain and Alberta media, they often assume I agree with them and have let their agenda slip a few times. Only shutting up when the see my face go pale. I wish all Conservatives had the vision that you describe in this column. I'd be less stressed a election time.
  • Rich
    Jane just to correct your points on Conservatives being red neck, I am conservative and I stand up for king and country; my grand parents where from England and served with distinction in the government service, I migrated to Canada in 1974 and after the allotted time I proudly stood up before the Citizenship court and swore allegiance to Canada: To this day my Canada is made up of 10 provinces and three territories of which all are equal in the eyes of the law. Being Canadian is not a requirement for what party a person chooses to support.
    I support the Conservatives, because I believe in each person taking the responsibility for their own lives through hard work and perserverance. We do not need Big Brother governments telling us what to do and when to do. In other words freedom of choice.
  • terry1
    Jane, if all tories thought the way you suggest they would be Liberals. As it is now the cons are a collection of members whose only rationale is to stay in power. They have no ideas and no vision beyond the next HOC vote.
blog comments powered by Disqus