Comments on: Narnia found!

By: Name

Name — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:51:39 +0000

Ignatieff, the Liberal Party and Toronto … three things Canada would be a better place without. It's a shame he couldn't take the latter two with him when he heads back to Harvard after the next election.

By: MrEd

MrEd — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:45:19 +0000

your understanding of human anatomy being such…”I don't have to lower my pants to give my brain feesh air.” (I think you ment Fresh) infered I had to do something I didn't to breath… It infered you needed to do this to get oxygen to your own brain and since you clearly stated you did not need to drop your own pants so eloquantly you must not be wearing pants… or the normal way you wear them is over your head and tied off around you neck cutting the oxygen supply to your brain … that is a given …for most people, we breath through our mouths or noses… my guess is you're a mouth breather…

By: terry1

terry1 — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:09:51 +0000

ED, did I say I wasn't wearing pants……..as usual you reformatorts read what you want in any sentence.

Are you the talking horse or the stalking one

By: MrEd

MrEd — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:58:51 +0000

so you're not wearing pants??? thats too much information thanks

By: MrEd

MrEd — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:11:41 +0000

One other thing that should be pointed out because Iffy seems to want to ignore this… over 297 cases of civil unrest happen on a daily basis in China… almost 300 a day!!! in the next 15 years over 50% of the standing ground troops, trained military fighting men and women will reach the age of manditory retirement and be assimilated back into the general population…

So Mr Iffy, What do you think is going to happen in China when the people who are being suppressed outnumber the people doing the suppressing and those who make up the population are trained in the art of war?

By: Name

Name — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:51:39 +0000

By: MrEd

MrEd — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:45:19 +0000

By: terry1

terry1 — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:09:51 +0000

ED, did I say I wasn't wearing pants……..as usual you reformatorts read what you want in any sentence.

Are you the talking horse or the stalking one

By: jt

jt — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:13:00 +0000

“I think that there are legitimate criticisms that can be raised about how our status quo treats certain regions unfairly, and we should absolutely try to address those issues.

Good. Let’s get rid of the CWB and eliminate milk quotas. On top of that dump subsidies to auto manufacturers, “supply managed” monopolies, egg boards, chicken boards, sugar beet subsidies and anything else that distorts trade, not only with our neighbours to the south, but provinces, too. How about eliminating that federal law against trucking more than two cases of beer over provincial borders and the interprovincial “wine” protectionism? Oh, and one other – the groupthink that bans the Irvings from shipping their crude products east of Montreal.

Should be enough homework for some aspiring provincial and federal finance ministers, eh?

By: MrEd

MrEd — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:58:51 +0000

so you're not wearing pants??? thats too much information thanks