<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NDP convention &#8212; Saturday summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/</link>
	<description>email@stephentaylor.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry1</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-13129</link>
		<dc:creator>terry1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-13129</guid>
		<description>Duplicate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duplicate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry1</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7915</link>
		<dc:creator>terry1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7915</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Dirty Tories&quot; strike again:&lt;br&gt;PMO Iqaluit gaffe draws smiles, frowns &lt;br&gt;(Harper-Iqaluit-Gaffe)&lt;br&gt;Source: The Canadian Press &lt;br&gt;Aug 18, 2009 11:09 &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OTTAWA - An unfortunate blunder by the Prime Minister&#039;s Office has residents of Nunavut alternately chuckling and cringing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A news release sent out Monday outlined Prime Minister Stephen Harper&#039;s itinerary as he began a five-day tour of the North. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The release repeatedly spelled the capital of Nunavut as Iqualuit - rather than Iqaluit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The extra `u&#039; makes a world of difference in the Inuktitut language. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Iqaluit, properly spelled, means `many fish.&#039; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spelled with an extra `u,&#039; the Nunavut language commissioner&#039;s office says the word translates as a derogatory reference to `people with unwiped bums.&#039; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(The Canadian Press)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Dirty Tories&#8221; strike again:<br />PMO Iqaluit gaffe draws smiles, frowns <br />(Harper-Iqaluit-Gaffe)<br />Source: The Canadian Press <br />Aug 18, 2009 11:09 </p>
<p>OTTAWA &#8211; An unfortunate blunder by the Prime Minister&#39;s Office has residents of Nunavut alternately chuckling and cringing. </p>
<p>A news release sent out Monday outlined Prime Minister Stephen Harper&#39;s itinerary as he began a five-day tour of the North. </p>
<p>The release repeatedly spelled the capital of Nunavut as Iqualuit &#8211; rather than Iqaluit. </p>
<p>The extra `u&#39; makes a world of difference in the Inuktitut language. </p>
<p>Iqaluit, properly spelled, means `many fish.&#39; </p>
<p>Spelled with an extra `u,&#39; the Nunavut language commissioner&#39;s office says the word translates as a derogatory reference to `people with unwiped bums.&#39; </p>
<p>(The Canadian Press)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parnella</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7886</link>
		<dc:creator>Parnella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7886</guid>
		<description>Did you go to the same Liberal troll school as this infamous &quot;Gayle&quot; dame? Just assuming it&#039;s a dame.  Maybe you could get together and form half a brain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry for being off topic , but what&#039;s left, the NDP love-in is over, nothing left but dealing with the rolling insults by the resident troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you go to the same Liberal troll school as this infamous &#8220;Gayle&#8221; dame? Just assuming it&#39;s a dame.  Maybe you could get together and form half a brain.</p>
<p>Sorry for being off topic , but what&#39;s left, the NDP love-in is over, nothing left but dealing with the rolling insults by the resident troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justinling</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator>justinling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>Let me just begin by saying that this is a great, albeit unabashedly biased, article and it has the virtue of explaining the nuances of the convention better than the uninterested media can. They were so bored, perhaps rightfully so, that they misunderstood some of the convention procedure that you seem to grasp.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I feel, though, that I must make a few nit-picky corrections. First off, I was the delegate that  &#039;moved to discuss aid on a case-by-case bilateral basis.&#039;  It wasn&#039;t quite as dramatic as you described, as some of us simply wanted to outline a strategy rather than passing rhetoric. And, may I add, the resolution passed unanimously when a list of improvised African nations were tagged onto the resolution. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, those &#039;delegates&#039; who talked in favour of the oil pipeline were union plants who would have a vested interest in seeing such a thing built. I was one who stood at the &#039;con&#039; mic to lash out against such an insane proposal (though, in the end, I allowed other to go ahead. One was Gary Doer&#039;s trade minister.) It ended up being soundly defeated, with only around 20 people supporting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me just begin by saying that this is a great, albeit unabashedly biased, article and it has the virtue of explaining the nuances of the convention better than the uninterested media can. They were so bored, perhaps rightfully so, that they misunderstood some of the convention procedure that you seem to grasp.</p>
<p>I feel, though, that I must make a few nit-picky corrections. First off, I was the delegate that  &#39;moved to discuss aid on a case-by-case bilateral basis.&#39;  It wasn&#39;t quite as dramatic as you described, as some of us simply wanted to outline a strategy rather than passing rhetoric. And, may I add, the resolution passed unanimously when a list of improvised African nations were tagged onto the resolution. </p>
<p>Secondly, those &#39;delegates&#39; who talked in favour of the oil pipeline were union plants who would have a vested interest in seeing such a thing built. I was one who stood at the &#39;con&#39; mic to lash out against such an insane proposal (though, in the end, I allowed other to go ahead. One was Gary Doer&#39;s trade minister.) It ended up being soundly defeated, with only around 20 people supporting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: east of eden</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>east of eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>Terri is fixated on male genatalia and all that is involved with it. I think there is something like a fetish there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terri is fixated on male genatalia and all that is involved with it. I think there is something like a fetish there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: east of eden</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>east of eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t wish to discuss it with YOU. There is a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#39;t wish to discuss it with YOU. There is a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: east of eden</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>east of eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>Sorry - Gayle has done no such thing. Nice try. Snort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; Gayle has done no such thing. Nice try. Snort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry1</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7879</link>
		<dc:creator>terry1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7879</guid>
		<description>I could have said white/??? and you would have called me a rascist.  The issue I brought up was ideology and you obviously couldn&#039;t get your head around it since you find it more important to make a miss manners out of me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You won&#039;t get there. I come from the Stephen Harpo school of  attack  and don&#039;t need nicities since our PM deosn&#039;t bother with them either. Just trying to communicate on a level that reformatorts seem to support.  Obviously liberals are not permitted to speak that way since nastiness appears to be IP of the reformatorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could have said white/??? and you would have called me a rascist.  The issue I brought up was ideology and you obviously couldn&#39;t get your head around it since you find it more important to make a miss manners out of me. </p>
<p>You won&#39;t get there. I come from the Stephen Harpo school of  attack  and don&#39;t need nicities since our PM deosn&#39;t bother with them either. Just trying to communicate on a level that reformatorts seem to support.  Obviously liberals are not permitted to speak that way since nastiness appears to be IP of the reformatorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parnella</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>Parnella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7877</guid>
		<description>BTW, &quot;everything old is new again&quot;, clever remark by one of our clever young guns, James Moore.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Saw a nice pic of his dog, &quot;Jed&quot;, a Bernese Mountain Dog. We have a Berner  in the family and they are smarter than the average Liberal troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, &#8220;everything old is new again&#8221;, clever remark by one of our clever young guns, James Moore.  </p>
<p>Saw a nice pic of his dog, &#8220;Jed&#8221;, a Bernese Mountain Dog. We have a Berner  in the family and they are smarter than the average Liberal troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parnella</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/08/ndp-convention-saturday-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-7876</link>
		<dc:creator>Parnella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1493#comment-7876</guid>
		<description>You are even assuming me to be white.  Appears to right up there with assuming I need larger underwear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get help, get it now!  Realize in trying to be funny ha, ha, you&#039;re becoming funny strange.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This thread is done, the NDP convention is of no consequence  to anything of particular importance to the grand scheme of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are even assuming me to be white.  Appears to right up there with assuming I need larger underwear.</p>
<p>Get help, get it now!  Realize in trying to be funny ha, ha, you&#39;re becoming funny strange.</p>
<p>This thread is done, the NDP convention is of no consequence  to anything of particular importance to the grand scheme of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

