<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seen on Parliament Hill &#8211; despite Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s best wishes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/</link>
	<description>email@stephentaylor.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: batb</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-13678</link>
		<dc:creator>batb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-13678</guid>
		<description>Hey! Where are today&#039;s comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Where are today&#39;s comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batb</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>batb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-6377</guid>
		<description>Hey! Where are today&#039;s comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Where are today&#39;s comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observant</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-22103</link>
		<dc:creator>Observant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-22103</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s your proto-typical Uncle Iggy Doodle Dandy comin&#039; back to Canada:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v714/stevekog/UncleIggy.jpg

or ...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s your proto-typical Uncle Iggy Doodle Dandy comin&#8217; back to Canada:</p>
<p><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v714/stevekog/UncleIggy.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v714/stevekog/UncleIggy.jpg</a></p>
<p>or &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-22102</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-22102</guid>
		<description>Stew, Wayne Gretzky isn&#039;t running for prime minister!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stew, Wayne Gretzky isn&#8217;t running for prime minister!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabby in QC</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-6326</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabby in QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-6326</guid>
		<description>EKOS poll:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-poll.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;“But the situation is clearly quite volatile, and neither party could force an election right now confident that they would win, much less form a majority. … &lt;br&gt;Michael Ignatieff trails Stephen Harper as the choice for “best prime minister”. ...”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EKOS poll:<br /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-poll.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-&#8230;</a> <br />“But the situation is clearly quite volatile, and neither party could force an election right now confident that they would win, much less form a majority. … <br />Michael Ignatieff trails Stephen Harper as the choice for “best prime minister”. &#8230;”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry1</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-6323</link>
		<dc:creator>terry1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-6323</guid>
		<description>Gabby the lone QC tory.....please read the full EKOS poll and you will see where tney noted Harper&#039;s started falling off badly after announcing the $50BB defict. The real effect of that fall off will show up in the June11  update of the poll. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep those dreams alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabby the lone QC tory&#8230;..please read the full EKOS poll and you will see where tney noted Harper&#39;s started falling off badly after announcing the $50BB defict. The real effect of that fall off will show up in the June11  update of the poll. </p>
<p>Keep those dreams alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougM</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-22101</link>
		<dc:creator>DougM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-22101</guid>
		<description>Ahh, Batb you&#039;re getting there but there is a lot more than just that.  As far back as Trudeau, when he campaigned against Joe Clark&#039;s Wage and Price controls and gas tax, them imposed a more draconian version as soon as he was in power, to Chretien&#039;s campaign on re-writing NAFTA and cancelling the GST, to his more recent  Red book in which he failed to do a single thing in it, the Liberals have made lying to the Canadian Public part of their brand.    Paradox - is a person a liar because he&#039;s a liberal or do liars just normally gravitate to the Liberal Party of Canada?   Is PMSH perfect?  Nope, but of the five things he promised, he delivered four while the other was held up in the Liberal dominated Senate.   He did back down on theTrust funds - because if he didn&#039;t when everybody started to hide their taxes in that haven the Govt&#039; would have lost too much revenue - those same people who want all the Govt services.  

The fact is, that while the Liberals promise things, they never deliver - instead we get , as you say, Shawinigate, the HRDC boondoggle, the overinflated Gun registry, Adscam therGrand mere affair etc. and you name it.  Essentially, and based on their record to date, the LPC seems as much a criminal organization as it is a political one - no wonder they took so long to come up with anti-gang legislation - they had to figure out how to bring it in so they weren&#039;t going to be caught up in it.  But I digress...

     Those in the center keep talking about &quot;Separation&quot; as though Quebec is some necessary part of it.  Quebec is convienent, but not necessary - the west has bankrolled Canada for decades at about 244 billion per year while Quebec eats up about 16 of that.  I have family back there and I enjoy Quebec - but it isn&#039;t the center of the universe any more than Toronto is.    Those in the west that are looking at their own version of Separation are very, very different from Quebec.  They have no intention of holding Canada hostage, which has always been Quebec&#039;s intention becuase it continued to work very well for them.  In part because they don&#039;t need to, the West is not in the same game and as each Liberal over the last decades coldn&#039;t drop a writ without degrading Alta they listened.   When the stupidity of the coalition of idiots came out there was a subtle shift in the mindset.  (The press at the time called it &quot;seething rage&quot;) and it wasn&#039;t nice conversation about how they could get more money out of the center.  The Liberals have given up the North and screwed the rest of the country and its going to be interesting if the screw ups can be reversed.  Frankly I&#039;m not sure if Quebec will accept Canada becuase its in their economic interest to do so (those that wish to be Emperor of Quebec dont&#039; care about the economics)  or the west will evict everything east of Manitouba, but for the next decade or two, they better hope for leaders from the west that can defuse the emotion that the idiots ignited or there will be new borders being drawn.

         Every time the Libs and the press complain about the &quot;attack adds&quot; on poor Mr. Absentee, I think of the way they went after Stockwell Day, and smile.   The Conservatives learned from that and now -when the press won&#039;t investigate, discuss or debate, the Conservatives will even if it takes their own money.   While it isn&#039;t illegal, voting for the LPC should be morally considered an act of disloyalty to Canada.  They seek power for powers sake - if not they would have instituted their platforms or at the very least - tried to move on them as Harper did.   For once we have someone with integrity to lead the country - even if he has to go to the states to get a viable interview - but in what were probably the only true words Trudeau ever said &quot;The incompetance of the press is matched only by their nastiness&quot;, maybe the next generation of them will not be so programed by the LPC - The Lying Party of Canada&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, Batb you&#8217;re getting there but there is a lot more than just that.  As far back as Trudeau, when he campaigned against Joe Clark&#8217;s Wage and Price controls and gas tax, them imposed a more draconian version as soon as he was in power, to Chretien&#8217;s campaign on re-writing NAFTA and cancelling the GST, to his more recent  Red book in which he failed to do a single thing in it, the Liberals have made lying to the Canadian Public part of their brand.    Paradox &#8211; is a person a liar because he&#8217;s a liberal or do liars just normally gravitate to the Liberal Party of Canada?   Is PMSH perfect?  Nope, but of the five things he promised, he delivered four while the other was held up in the Liberal dominated Senate.   He did back down on theTrust funds &#8211; because if he didn&#8217;t when everybody started to hide their taxes in that haven the Govt&#8217; would have lost too much revenue &#8211; those same people who want all the Govt services.  </p>
<p>The fact is, that while the Liberals promise things, they never deliver &#8211; instead we get , as you say, Shawinigate, the HRDC boondoggle, the overinflated Gun registry, Adscam therGrand mere affair etc. and you name it.  Essentially, and based on their record to date, the LPC seems as much a criminal organization as it is a political one &#8211; no wonder they took so long to come up with anti-gang legislation &#8211; they had to figure out how to bring it in so they weren&#8217;t going to be caught up in it.  But I digress&#8230;</p>
<p>     Those in the center keep talking about &#8220;Separation&#8221; as though Quebec is some necessary part of it.  Quebec is convienent, but not necessary &#8211; the west has bankrolled Canada for decades at about 244 billion per year while Quebec eats up about 16 of that.  I have family back there and I enjoy Quebec &#8211; but it isn&#8217;t the center of the universe any more than Toronto is.    Those in the west that are looking at their own version of Separation are very, very different from Quebec.  They have no intention of holding Canada hostage, which has always been Quebec&#8217;s intention becuase it continued to work very well for them.  In part because they don&#8217;t need to, the West is not in the same game and as each Liberal over the last decades coldn&#8217;t drop a writ without degrading Alta they listened.   When the stupidity of the coalition of idiots came out there was a subtle shift in the mindset.  (The press at the time called it &#8220;seething rage&#8221;) and it wasn&#8217;t nice conversation about how they could get more money out of the center.  The Liberals have given up the North and screwed the rest of the country and its going to be interesting if the screw ups can be reversed.  Frankly I&#8217;m not sure if Quebec will accept Canada becuase its in their economic interest to do so (those that wish to be Emperor of Quebec dont&#8217; care about the economics)  or the west will evict everything east of Manitouba, but for the next decade or two, they better hope for leaders from the west that can defuse the emotion that the idiots ignited or there will be new borders being drawn.</p>
<p>         Every time the Libs and the press complain about the &#8220;attack adds&#8221; on poor Mr. Absentee, I think of the way they went after Stockwell Day, and smile.   The Conservatives learned from that and now -when the press won&#8217;t investigate, discuss or debate, the Conservatives will even if it takes their own money.   While it isn&#8217;t illegal, voting for the LPC should be morally considered an act of disloyalty to Canada.  They seek power for powers sake &#8211; if not they would have instituted their platforms or at the very least &#8211; tried to move on them as Harper did.   For once we have someone with integrity to lead the country &#8211; even if he has to go to the states to get a viable interview &#8211; but in what were probably the only true words Trudeau ever said &#8220;The incompetance of the press is matched only by their nastiness&#8221;, maybe the next generation of them will not be so programed by the LPC &#8211; The Lying Party of Canada&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry1</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>terry1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>Paulsstuff,,,,,,I think you need to look at the trends as the pollsters are. They see where the Liberal votes are more efficient and will get Iggy elected. The recession is not yet over with the worst news still to come and of course another Flatulence &quot;update&quot;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember, the pollsters are smarter than you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulsstuff,,,,,,I think you need to look at the trends as the pollsters are. They see where the Liberal votes are more efficient and will get Iggy elected. The recession is not yet over with the worst news still to come and of course another Flatulence &#8220;update&#8221;. </p>
<p>Remember, the pollsters are smarter than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabby in QC</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-6314</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabby in QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-6314</guid>
		<description>Re: EKOS poll&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/04/16/ekos-poll-political-preference.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/04/16/ekos-...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;Conservatives slipping, Liberals gaining: EKOS poll&lt;br&gt;Governing party&#039;s support dropping in Ontario, Quebec, survey suggests&lt;br&gt;Last Updated: &lt;b&gt;Thursday, April 16, 2009&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Asked which party they would support if an election were held tomorrow, 36.7 opted for the Liberals while 30.2 per cent chose the Conservatives. About 15.5 per cent supported the NDP, while the Green party was the choice of 8.1 per cent and the Bloc Québécois was backed by 9.4 per cent. ...”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But here&#039;s the latest&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/01/federal-poll357.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/01/feder...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;“Minority government possible for Liberals, poll suggests&lt;br&gt;Survey indicates Ignatieff&#039;s party would top Tories in election tomorrow&lt;br&gt;Last Updated: &lt;b&gt;Monday, June 1, 2009&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;The poll found 33.5 per cent of respondents would vote Liberal. Another 32.3 per cent said they would vote Conservative, and 15.1 per cent said they would vote NDP. … &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Harper preferred as PM choice&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;The news is not all encouraging for the Liberals, whose leader, Michael Ignatieff, trailed Conservative Leader Stephen Harper when respondents were asked who would make the best prime minister.&lt;br&gt;Thirty per cent chose Harper, 26 per cent opted for Ignatieff … “&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now let&#039;s see one of the questions asked&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-poll.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Q. All things considered, would you say the COUNTRY/GOVERNMENT OF CANADA is moving in the right direction or the wrong direction? &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;May 7-28 2009&lt;/b&gt; (results June 1)	&lt;br&gt;                55% Right direction  35% wrong direction   11% don’t know (COUNTRY)	&lt;br&gt;		46% right direction   42% wrong direction   12% don’t know  (GOVERNMENT OF CANADA)&lt;br&gt;How do those figures compare with last April?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/political-update-results-cbc.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/political-update-res...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Apr. 8-13 2009&lt;/b&gt;  	&lt;br&gt;                47% right direction   41% wrong direction   12% don’t know  (COUNTRY)&lt;br&gt;		38% right direction   49% wrong direction   13% don’t know  (GOVERNMENT OF CANADA)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has there been a change from April to June? Yes.&lt;br&gt;8% surge in approval rating in both &quot;the country and the government are going in the right direction&quot; ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: EKOS poll<br /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/04/16/ekos-poll-political-preference.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/04/16/ekos-&#8230;</a> <br />&#8220;Conservatives slipping, Liberals gaining: EKOS poll<br />Governing party&#39;s support dropping in Ontario, Quebec, survey suggests<br />Last Updated: <b>Thursday, April 16, 2009</b><br />Asked which party they would support if an election were held tomorrow, 36.7 opted for the Liberals while 30.2 per cent chose the Conservatives. About 15.5 per cent supported the NDP, while the Green party was the choice of 8.1 per cent and the Bloc Québécois was backed by 9.4 per cent. &#8230;”</p>
<p>But here&#39;s the latest<br /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/01/federal-poll357.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/01/feder&#8230;</a> <br />“Minority government possible for Liberals, poll suggests<br />Survey indicates Ignatieff&#39;s party would top Tories in election tomorrow<br />Last Updated: <b>Monday, June 1, 2009</b><br />The poll found 33.5 per cent of respondents would vote Liberal. Another 32.3 per cent said they would vote Conservative, and 15.1 per cent said they would vote NDP. … </p>
<p><b>Harper preferred as PM choice</b><br />The news is not all encouraging for the Liberals, whose leader, Michael Ignatieff, trailed Conservative Leader Stephen Harper when respondents were asked who would make the best prime minister.<br />Thirty per cent chose Harper, 26 per cent opted for Ignatieff … “</p>
<p>Now let&#39;s see one of the questions asked<br /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-poll.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/0779-june1-ekos-cbc-&#8230;</a> <br />Q. All things considered, would you say the COUNTRY/GOVERNMENT OF CANADA is moving in the right direction or the wrong direction? <br /><b>May 7-28 2009</b> (results June 1)	<br />                55% Right direction  35% wrong direction   11% don’t know (COUNTRY)	<br />		46% right direction   42% wrong direction   12% don’t know  (GOVERNMENT OF CANADA)<br />How do those figures compare with last April?<br /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/political-update-results-cbc.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/political-update-res&#8230;</a> <br /><b>Apr. 8-13 2009</b>  	<br />                47% right direction   41% wrong direction   12% don’t know  (COUNTRY)<br />		38% right direction   49% wrong direction   13% don’t know  (GOVERNMENT OF CANADA)</p>
<p>Has there been a change from April to June? Yes.<br />8% surge in approval rating in both &#8220;the country and the government are going in the right direction&#8221; ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryT</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/seen-on-parliament-hill/comment-page-2/#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1444#comment-6313</guid>
		<description>No matter how clean Iggy is from all the scandals of the libs, he still has all those that were involved in many of the scandals ect in his caucus.  They would still be there if he is PM.  That is the problem.  And I disagree, most cdns have not embraced the visitor.  &lt;br&gt;Just wait till Duceppe takes after Iggy in Quebec.  It is separtist votes Iggy is going after.  &lt;br&gt;I spent the weekend travelling on Greyhound,  Listened to conversations of cdns going to many places, and Iggy and his EI was not a popular topic.  Lots of positive comments on the visitor ads.  The msm and libs might think they are backfiring but they are not.  People are paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how clean Iggy is from all the scandals of the libs, he still has all those that were involved in many of the scandals ect in his caucus.  They would still be there if he is PM.  That is the problem.  And I disagree, most cdns have not embraced the visitor.  <br />Just wait till Duceppe takes after Iggy in Quebec.  It is separtist votes Iggy is going after.  <br />I spent the weekend travelling on Greyhound,  Listened to conversations of cdns going to many places, and Iggy and his EI was not a popular topic.  Lots of positive comments on the visitor ads.  The msm and libs might think they are backfiring but they are not.  People are paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

