<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Ayers denied entry into Canada.  So why the shock?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/</link>
	<description>email@stephentaylor.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobo Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-13072</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobo Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-13072</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question.  Does the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act really protect Canada when it denies former employees of certain organizations entry to Canada?   For example, is there any case of an ex (retired or fired or resigned) CIA, or British Intelligence agent being denied entry to Canada?  These would seem to be people who are covered under the new Act in its section 34.  Should they be denied entry?  Is this protecting Canada?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s a question.  Does the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act really protect Canada when it denies former employees of certain organizations entry to Canada?   For example, is there any case of an ex (retired or fired or resigned) CIA, or British Intelligence agent being denied entry to Canada?  These would seem to be people who are covered under the new Act in its section 34.  Should they be denied entry?  Is this protecting Canada?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobo Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobo Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question.  Does the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act really protect Canada when it denies former employees of certain organizations entry to Canada?   For example, is there any case of an ex (retired or fired or resigned) CIA, or British Intelligence agent being denied entry to Canada?  These would seem to be people who are covered under the new Act in its section 34.  Should they be denied entry?  Is this protecting Canada?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s a question.  Does the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act really protect Canada when it denies former employees of certain organizations entry to Canada?   For example, is there any case of an ex (retired or fired or resigned) CIA, or British Intelligence agent being denied entry to Canada?  These would seem to be people who are covered under the new Act in its section 34.  Should they be denied entry?  Is this protecting Canada?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snapple</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3658</link>
		<dc:creator>Snapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3658</guid>
		<description>Nik-&lt;br&gt;I am pretty informed about Ayers&#039; MO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dear Mr.. Taylor,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Am I correct that the Globe and Mail article you cited added the claim that Ayers was refused entry in 2005? I don&#039;t think that was in the original article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, can you show me an article in a major paper that confirms from Canadian government sources that Ayers actually was refused entry?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I have seen is customs saying they can&#039;t comment for privacy reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The papers may all be taking it for granted that this happened.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have not seen a government source confirm that they refused Ayers entry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nik-<br />I am pretty informed about Ayers&#39; MO.</p>
<p>Dear Mr.. Taylor,</p>
<p>Am I correct that the Globe and Mail article you cited added the claim that Ayers was refused entry in 2005? I don&#39;t think that was in the original article.</p>
<p>Also, can you show me an article in a major paper that confirms from Canadian government sources that Ayers actually was refused entry?</p>
<p>What I have seen is customs saying they can&#39;t comment for privacy reasons.</p>
<p>The papers may all be taking it for granted that this happened.</p>
<p>I have not seen a government source confirm that they refused Ayers entry.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-21085</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-21085</guid>
		<description>Ayers is as left as left gets and has unfortunately &quot;a name&quot; which brings visibility to ultra left events so we&#039;ll see more of this until he&#039;s once again forgotten.  Some were of course pissed off that he wasn&#039;t delivered and their dog and pony show lost its luster.  I&#039;m quite certain his is an intellect easily surpassed by a great many of our own ultra left so any of them would have been able to bolster whatever the agenda was in a manner more in tune with the environment of Canada although with infinitely less fanfare.

As for being &quot;denied&quot;, there are more than a few Canadians in the NDP bastion CUPE itself who are themselves in need of some ultra left support for being turned around at the US border for minor pot charges and drunk driving offenses.  I&#039;m certain they&#039;ll be jumping right on that.

I remember when there was only the usenet.  Other than the GUI, glut of commercialization and content from those not tech savvy, the major difference is that we&#039;ve traded depth for width.  There are those of us still who have never gave a second glance to &quot;the poster&quot; on the wall but accessed our Medline and Medscape accounts and to seen for our selves if such a study exists.

Oh and no I&#039;m not a fascist but rather I was a card carrying NDP until Jack The Entitled showed up at the helm.  You just have to draw a line somewhere and mine was rhetoric had to be with regard given to this reality.  If I wanted Sci-Fi, I&#039;d be into Scientology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayers is as left as left gets and has unfortunately &#8220;a name&#8221; which brings visibility to ultra left events so we&#8217;ll see more of this until he&#8217;s once again forgotten.  Some were of course pissed off that he wasn&#8217;t delivered and their dog and pony show lost its luster.  I&#8217;m quite certain his is an intellect easily surpassed by a great many of our own ultra left so any of them would have been able to bolster whatever the agenda was in a manner more in tune with the environment of Canada although with infinitely less fanfare.</p>
<p>As for being &#8220;denied&#8221;, there are more than a few Canadians in the NDP bastion CUPE itself who are themselves in need of some ultra left support for being turned around at the US border for minor pot charges and drunk driving offenses.  I&#8217;m certain they&#8217;ll be jumping right on that.</p>
<p>I remember when there was only the usenet.  Other than the GUI, glut of commercialization and content from those not tech savvy, the major difference is that we&#8217;ve traded depth for width.  There are those of us still who have never gave a second glance to &#8220;the poster&#8221; on the wall but accessed our Medline and Medscape accounts and to seen for our selves if such a study exists.</p>
<p>Oh and no I&#8217;m not a fascist but rather I was a card carrying NDP until Jack The Entitled showed up at the helm.  You just have to draw a line somewhere and mine was rhetoric had to be with regard given to this reality.  If I wanted Sci-Fi, I&#8217;d be into Scientology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lack of knowledge on a subject does not serve to discount one&#039;s opinion.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, it does.  My brother, let me share with you a parable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over a decade ago, I was working as a temp.  The manager of the office received an email about how Nutrasweet causes lupus and other serious illnesses.  She posted copies of the email throughout the office.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read it and sighed.  It was obviously an urban legend.  But she was the boss and I would leave it be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One day, I was sitting in the cafeteria, drinking a Diet Coke.  Someone saw me and gasped.  &quot;Don&#039;t you know Nutrasweet causes lupus?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Irritated, I went online, found proof the lupus story was an urban legend, and took it to the manager.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;It&#039;s an urban legend,&quot; I said, and handed her my print out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I know,&quot; she admitted.  Turns out that after she put up the posters, she found out it was an urban legend, and was too embarrassed to admit her error.  So she just left the posters up and kept her mouth shut.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Can I make copies of my findings and post them up?&quot; I asked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She agreed to it.  And I did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A few days later, a few of us were chatting, and someone said in passing, &quot;Well, I&#039;d never use Nutrasweet because it causes lupus.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Irritated, I explained to him he was wrong.  Our manager fell for an urban legend and I did research and debunked it.  Didn&#039;t he remember any of this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He paused for a moment, and then said, &quot;Oh, you can use the Internet to prove anything, nowadays.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone (besides me) nodded in agreement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I was overwhelmed with a great and horrible despair for the future of all of humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lack of knowledge on a subject does not serve to discount one&#39;s opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, it does.  My brother, let me share with you a parable.</p>
<p>Over a decade ago, I was working as a temp.  The manager of the office received an email about how Nutrasweet causes lupus and other serious illnesses.  She posted copies of the email throughout the office.  </p>
<p>I read it and sighed.  It was obviously an urban legend.  But she was the boss and I would leave it be.</p>
<p>One day, I was sitting in the cafeteria, drinking a Diet Coke.  Someone saw me and gasped.  &#8220;Don&#39;t you know Nutrasweet causes lupus?&#8221;</p>
<p>Irritated, I went online, found proof the lupus story was an urban legend, and took it to the manager.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#39;s an urban legend,&#8221; I said, and handed her my print out.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know,&#8221; she admitted.  Turns out that after she put up the posters, she found out it was an urban legend, and was too embarrassed to admit her error.  So she just left the posters up and kept her mouth shut.</p>
<p>&#8220;Can I make copies of my findings and post them up?&#8221; I asked.</p>
<p>She agreed to it.  And I did.</p>
<p>A few days later, a few of us were chatting, and someone said in passing, &#8220;Well, I&#39;d never use Nutrasweet because it causes lupus.&#8221;</p>
<p>Irritated, I explained to him he was wrong.  Our manager fell for an urban legend and I did research and debunked it.  Didn&#39;t he remember any of this?</p>
<p>He paused for a moment, and then said, &#8220;Oh, you can use the Internet to prove anything, nowadays.&#8221;</p>
<p>Everyone (besides me) nodded in agreement.</p>
<p>And I was overwhelmed with a great and horrible despair for the future of all of humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>Nik - Thanks for setting me straight.  I should not have used stupid words (my gut), and I certainly should not have said anything out loud.  It is obvious that my short note contains thoughts better kept to myself since these ideas came out of my ass.  My suggestion that Ayers has nothing to offer educators is wrong, wrong, wrong.  What was I thinking!  - sarcasm off&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Allow me to rephrase my OPINION:&lt;br&gt;Does Ayers have anything constructive (within the notable limitations of my poor insufficient brain) to offer our educators? My gut says no.  {Rick breaks wind}&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on now.  Sure, Mr. Ayers&#039; CV is not on my reading list.  Perhaps you know far more about him than I do.  Agreed?  Agreed.  This fact(?), in itself, adds nothing to the discussion.  I voiced an opinion.  Opinions are formed with or without in-depth knowledge of a subject.  Lack of knowledge on a subject does not serve to discount one&#039;s opinion.  One&#039;s opinion is what drives democracy.  Yes, it&#039;s true.  People vote without knowing much about anything.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What seems to have been overlooked is that you and I shared similar thoughts on the subject of why Ayers was denied entry.  So I guess I was only talking out of my ass when the words disagreed with yours?  Thanks, at least, for saying it is a &quot;little&quot; round hole.  You could have instead called me a big a--hole.  And I would agree with you.  :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post your opinions.  People will read them.  But please...put your daggers away.  It scares the kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nik &#8211; Thanks for setting me straight.  I should not have used stupid words (my gut), and I certainly should not have said anything out loud.  It is obvious that my short note contains thoughts better kept to myself since these ideas came out of my ass.  My suggestion that Ayers has nothing to offer educators is wrong, wrong, wrong.  What was I thinking!  &#8211; sarcasm off</p>
<p>Allow me to rephrase my OPINION:<br />Does Ayers have anything constructive (within the notable limitations of my poor insufficient brain) to offer our educators? My gut says no.  {Rick breaks wind}</p>
<p>Come on now.  Sure, Mr. Ayers&#39; CV is not on my reading list.  Perhaps you know far more about him than I do.  Agreed?  Agreed.  This fact(?), in itself, adds nothing to the discussion.  I voiced an opinion.  Opinions are formed with or without in-depth knowledge of a subject.  Lack of knowledge on a subject does not serve to discount one&#39;s opinion.  One&#39;s opinion is what drives democracy.  Yes, it&#39;s true.  People vote without knowing much about anything.  </p>
<p>What seems to have been overlooked is that you and I shared similar thoughts on the subject of why Ayers was denied entry.  So I guess I was only talking out of my ass when the words disagreed with yours?  Thanks, at least, for saying it is a &#8220;little&#8221; round hole.  You could have instead called me a big a&#8211;hole.  And I would agree with you.  <img src='http://www.stephentaylor.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Post your opinions.  People will read them.  But please&#8230;put your daggers away.  It scares the kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>Raise the tone please, Nik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raise the tone please, Nik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3652</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3652</guid>
		<description>I wish the government would interfere less in my healthcare decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the government would interfere less in my healthcare decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3653</guid>
		<description>Snapple:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&amp;tab=wn&amp;ned=ca&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ncl=1294845366&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&amp;tab=wn&amp;ned=ca&amp;...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The above link will get you roughly 95 news stories about Bill Ayers being refused entry into Canada.  A few of those stories include reports from Canada Customs.  They admit they turned Ayers away at the border, but claim they are not allowed to say why they did so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s a lesson for you regarding your future existence as a human being: if you don&#039;t know something, don&#039;t assume you know something.  Do some research, and find out the truth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re welcome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Nik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snapple:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&#038;tab=wn&#038;ned=ca&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;ncl=1294845366" rel="nofollow">http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&#038;tab=wn&#038;ned=ca&#038;&#8230;</a></p>
<p>The above link will get you roughly 95 news stories about Bill Ayers being refused entry into Canada.  A few of those stories include reports from Canada Customs.  They admit they turned Ayers away at the border, but claim they are not allowed to say why they did so.</p>
<p>Here&#39;s a lesson for you regarding your future existence as a human being: if you don&#39;t know something, don&#39;t assume you know something.  Do some research, and find out the truth.</p>
<p>You&#39;re welcome.</p>
<p>    Nik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/01/bill-ayers-denied-entry-into-canada-so-why-the-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-3651</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1316#comment-3651</guid>
		<description>Liz, are you aware that the American people, who elect their governments, overwhelmingly want socialized healthcare?  The vast majority also think marijuana laws are ridiculously punitive.  And they overwhelmingly want to be a part of the Kyoto environmental agreement.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, there&#039;s a lot the American people want -- yet, strangely, the people they elect won&#039;t give them those things.  Why is that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s my best guess -- electing a representative every four years doesn&#039;t really get you democracy.  It gets you someone who acts in their own best interest, and then justifies it at the next election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am amazed at disturbed at a lot of the comments on this blog which indicate a love of authority and representatives acting &quot;in our best interests&quot;.  Being conservative used to mean a desire for less government interference, and not a yearning for more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YOU are your own authority.  That representative you elected?  You can be sure that person is only going to act in your best interest if you are standing in the room, watching their every move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, are you aware that the American people, who elect their governments, overwhelmingly want socialized healthcare?  The vast majority also think marijuana laws are ridiculously punitive.  And they overwhelmingly want to be a part of the Kyoto environmental agreement.  </p>
<p>In fact, there&#39;s a lot the American people want &#8212; yet, strangely, the people they elect won&#39;t give them those things.  Why is that?</p>
<p>Here&#39;s my best guess &#8212; electing a representative every four years doesn&#39;t really get you democracy.  It gets you someone who acts in their own best interest, and then justifies it at the next election.</p>
<p>I am amazed at disturbed at a lot of the comments on this blog which indicate a love of authority and representatives acting &#8220;in our best interests&#8221;.  Being conservative used to mean a desire for less government interference, and not a yearning for more.</p>
<p>YOU are your own authority.  That representative you elected?  You can be sure that person is only going to act in your best interest if you are standing in the room, watching their every move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

