<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Example of plagiarism by Stephane Dion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/</link>
	<description>email@stephentaylor.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Cutforth</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-13706</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Cutforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-13706</guid>
		<description>Or I can plagiarize you and say the word &quot;the&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OR I can NOT bankrupt Ontario like Mr. Rae. &lt;- directed at the whole conversation starter. (Mr. Rae)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or I can plagiarize you and say the word &#8220;the&#8221;.</p>
<p>OR I can NOT bankrupt Ontario like Mr. Rae. &lt;- directed at the whole conversation starter. (Mr. Rae)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Cutforth</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Cutforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really really busy saving the world so I&#039;ll have to address this in parts when I can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&quot;People go on and on about how &quot;neo-conservative&quot; we are, without any real substantial understanding of that that means. Dion&#039;s Wife is far more &quot;neo-conservative&quot; in regards to terrorism in comparison the Conservative party.&quot;&quot; -me&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a fair enough point for you to of called me on... actually the only one from my post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I&#039;ll address it later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&quot;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&quot;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ me&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This was said in regards to anything I post--but particularly what was said in regards to conspiracy theories/possible truths--both my own and others. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;1000s of scientist around the world believe in Climate change, if you don&#039;t that doesn’t mean liberals are fear mongers.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ You, aptly named &quot;New to this blog&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone who knows my positions on the environment knows why I&#039;m not gonna waste time tackling this ASAP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;ll say, the environment isn&#039;t something restricted to climate change.&lt;br&gt;What the Conservatives and even the Libertarians have proposed makes the most sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know your gonna rag on me on for this saying its not an answer or decide to interpret it that way. Given all I&#039;ve said, I can&#039;t be left to waste time on little squabbles like this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This week is supposed to be my vacation time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m really really busy saving the world so I&#39;ll have to address this in parts when I can.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;People go on and on about how &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221; we are, without any real substantial understanding of that that means. Dion&#39;s Wife is far more &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221; in regards to terrorism in comparison the Conservative party.&#8221;" -me</p>
<p>This is a fair enough point for you to of called me on&#8230; actually the only one from my post.</p>
<p>That said, I&#39;ll address it later.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&#8221;"</p>
<p>~ me</p>
<p>This was said in regards to anything I post&#8211;but particularly what was said in regards to conspiracy theories/possible truths&#8211;both my own and others. </p>
<p>&#8220;1000s of scientist around the world believe in Climate change, if you don&#39;t that doesn’t mean liberals are fear mongers.&#8221;</p>
<p>~ You, aptly named &#8220;New to this blog&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone who knows my positions on the environment knows why I&#39;m not gonna waste time tackling this ASAP.</p>
<p>But I&#39;ll say, the environment isn&#39;t something restricted to climate change.<br />What the Conservatives and even the Libertarians have proposed makes the most sense.</p>
<p>I know your gonna rag on me on for this saying its not an answer or decide to interpret it that way. Given all I&#39;ve said, I can&#39;t be left to waste time on little squabbles like this.</p>
<p>This week is supposed to be my vacation time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Cutforth</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Cutforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>Or I can plagiarize you and say the word &quot;the&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OR I can NOT bankrupt Ontario like Mr. Rae. &lt;- directed at the whole conversation starter. (Mr. Rae)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or I can plagiarize you and say the word &#8220;the&#8221;.</p>
<p>OR I can NOT bankrupt Ontario like Mr. Rae. &lt;- directed at the whole conversation starter. (Mr. Rae)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Cutforth</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Cutforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really really busy saving the world so I&#039;ll have to address this in parts when I can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&quot;People go on and on about how &quot;neo-conservative&quot; we are, without any real substantial understanding of that that means. Dion&#039;s Wife is far more &quot;neo-conservative&quot; in regards to terrorism in comparison the Conservative party.&quot;&quot; -me&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a fair enough point for you to of called me on... actually the only one from my post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I&#039;ll address it later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&quot;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&quot;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ me&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This was said in regards to anything I post--but particularly what was said in regards to conspiracy theories/possible truths--both my own and others. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;1000s of scientist around the world believe in Climate change, if you don&#039;t that doesn’t mean liberals are fear mongers.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ You, aptly named &quot;New to this blog&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone who knows my positions on the environment knows why I&#039;m not gonna waste time tackling this ASAP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;ll say, the environment isn&#039;t something restricted to climate change.&lt;br&gt;What the Conservatives and even the Libertarians have proposed makes the most sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know your gonna rag on me on for this saying its not an answer or decide to interpret it that way. Given all I&#039;ve said, I can&#039;t be left to waste time on little squabbles like this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This week is supposed to be my vacation time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m really really busy saving the world so I&#39;ll have to address this in parts when I can.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;People go on and on about how &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221; we are, without any real substantial understanding of that that means. Dion&#39;s Wife is far more &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221; in regards to terrorism in comparison the Conservative party.&#8221;" -me</p>
<p>This is a fair enough point for you to of called me on&#8230; actually the only one from my post.</p>
<p>That said, I&#39;ll address it later.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&#8221;"</p>
<p>~ me</p>
<p>This was said in regards to anything I post&#8211;but particularly what was said in regards to conspiracy theories/possible truths&#8211;both my own and others. </p>
<p>&#8220;1000s of scientist around the world believe in Climate change, if you don&#39;t that doesn’t mean liberals are fear mongers.&#8221;</p>
<p>~ You, aptly named &#8220;New to this blog&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone who knows my positions on the environment knows why I&#39;m not gonna waste time tackling this ASAP.</p>
<p>But I&#39;ll say, the environment isn&#39;t something restricted to climate change.<br />What the Conservatives and even the Libertarians have proposed makes the most sense.</p>
<p>I know your gonna rag on me on for this saying its not an answer or decide to interpret it that way. Given all I&#39;ve said, I can&#39;t be left to waste time on little squabbles like this.</p>
<p>This week is supposed to be my vacation time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New to this blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-2134</link>
		<dc:creator>New to this blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-2134</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t we defensive. Great Speech! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thoroughly enjoyed your empty worded rant. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Proof? For what? I never claimed anything except asking you for “points or reasons”. Obviously you have none. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;liberal fear mongers&quot; ~ Taylor Cutfort  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wonderful!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Liberals believe in CLIMATE CHANGE, obviously! That’s fear mongering? I dunno a lot of scientists, believe in that. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;They get like this when they can&#039;t explain their positions or reasoning they resort to attacking.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Liberal&#039;s can explain their position about climate change. Climate change has been Scientifically proven! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;where&#039;s your proof for these claims? :&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;resorting to a complete disregard of the facts. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such as…..? no explanation, just rants…..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;People go on and on about how &quot;neo-conservative&quot; we are, without any real substantial understanding of that that means. Dion&#039;s Wife is far more &quot;neo-conservative&quot; in regards to terrorism in comparison the Conservative party.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I said: &quot;give some points or reasons....&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;where are they.. all you gave was a long winded rant...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;funny how you say: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Firstly, get your facts straight then post! If you don’t know something, why are you acting like you know something!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1000s of scientist around the world believe in Climate change, if you don&#039;t that doesn’t mean liberals are fear mongers. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, If you want to make a point do it, but back it up with some reasoning or proof. Otherwise your words are nothing more than random fiction!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thirdly, you say your intentions are to get people thinking? Great! I agree, discourse in this country is often lacking. So post information that will get people thinking. Don’t just rant random emotions on blogs, where the proof to your claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#39;t we defensive. Great Speech! </p>
<p>I thoroughly enjoyed your empty worded rant. </p>
<p>My Proof? For what? I never claimed anything except asking you for “points or reasons”. Obviously you have none. </p>
<p>&#8220;liberal fear mongers&#8221; ~ Taylor Cutfort  </p>
<p>Wonderful!</p>
<p>Liberals believe in CLIMATE CHANGE, obviously! That’s fear mongering? I dunno a lot of scientists, believe in that. </p>
<p>&#8220;They get like this when they can&#39;t explain their positions or reasoning they resort to attacking.&#8221;</p>
<p>Liberal&#39;s can explain their position about climate change. Climate change has been Scientifically proven! </p>
<p>where&#39;s your proof for these claims? :</p>
<p>&#8220;resorting to a complete disregard of the facts. &#8220;</p>
<p>Such as…..? no explanation, just rants…..</p>
<p>&#8220;People go on and on about how &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221; we are, without any real substantial understanding of that that means. Dion&#39;s Wife is far more &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221; in regards to terrorism in comparison the Conservative party.&#8221;</p>
<p>I said: &#8220;give some points or reasons&#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>where are they.. all you gave was a long winded rant&#8230;</p>
<p>funny how you say: </p>
<p>&#8220;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&#8221;</p>
<p>Firstly, get your facts straight then post! If you don’t know something, why are you acting like you know something!</p>
<p>1000s of scientist around the world believe in Climate change, if you don&#39;t that doesn’t mean liberals are fear mongers. </p>
<p>Secondly, If you want to make a point do it, but back it up with some reasoning or proof. Otherwise your words are nothing more than random fiction!</p>
<p>Thirdly, you say your intentions are to get people thinking? Great! I agree, discourse in this country is often lacking. So post information that will get people thinking. Don’t just rant random emotions on blogs, where the proof to your claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-2042</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-2042</guid>
		<description>Hey stephen still thinking more than 85 seats..........you guys are falling apart. Breaks my heart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You will possibly have less than 10 seats coming out of the maritimes and Quebec. Pretty scary for a party of ideolgues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey stephen still thinking more than 85 seats&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.you guys are falling apart. Breaks my heart.</p>
<p>You will possibly have less than 10 seats coming out of the maritimes and Quebec. Pretty scary for a party of ideolgues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Cutforth</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Cutforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>What the eff are you guys talking about?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and wheres YOUR proof of this??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I go about everywhere I need to--to set straight much of the misinformation and propagandize BS thats being spewed out from both the extreme Right and PARTICULARLY the Left in this country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s funny how these guys try to call me out on things meanwhile they hide behind their anonymity while at the same time try to attack MY credibility with empty statements. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently &quot;[I never provide any] one fact of any consequence.&quot;  ~Terry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, you say that without even providing anything to back that up.   &lt;br&gt;Which I&#039;ve been find to be more than typical of any Liberal supporter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;what are you talking about. you just sound dumb. give some points or reasons....&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~New to this blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a lot there in that post, could you be a little less vague?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not everything I say is gonna be 100% right or accurate as I am still taking in a near-constant flow of information through multiple means while I research into things.&lt;br&gt;And it so happens, I&#039;m way ahead of both of you on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Taylor cutowrth is on every blog in town withhis attack ad garbage.&quot; ~Terry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve been starting to see these sorts of dismissive remarks about me else where and its always from the Liberal supporters, so I must be getting closer to the truth as its looking rather organized.&lt;br&gt;They get like this when they can&#039;t explain their positions or reasoning they resort to attacking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not much different to how the &quot;Liberals&quot; are like when in the HOC and committees...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bet some of you are part of their campaigners or the even some MPs family members as such things have been suggested before. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;like Gayle for instance and others, but I don&#039;t wish to speculate any further at this time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No doubt, there are others reading this who know what I mean...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the eff are you guys talking about?</p>
<p>and wheres YOUR proof of this??</p>
<p>I go about everywhere I need to&#8211;to set straight much of the misinformation and propagandize BS thats being spewed out from both the extreme Right and PARTICULARLY the Left in this country.</p>
<p>It&#39;s funny how these guys try to call me out on things meanwhile they hide behind their anonymity while at the same time try to attack MY credibility with empty statements. </p>
<p>Apparently &#8220;[I never provide any] one fact of any consequence.&#8221;  ~Terry</p>
<p>Meanwhile, you say that without even providing anything to back that up.   <br />Which I&#39;ve been find to be more than typical of any Liberal supporter.</p>
<p>&#8220;what are you talking about. you just sound dumb. give some points or reasons&#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>~New to this blog</p>
<p>There is a lot there in that post, could you be a little less vague?</p>
<p>Some of what I suggest may be just an opinion or a speculation, which can be wrong but are much more often right or occasionally just off by a bit. Never the less, the goal is to get people thinking out side of themselves and their own entrenched perspectives.</p>
<p>Not everything I say is gonna be 100% right or accurate as I am still taking in a near-constant flow of information through multiple means while I research into things.<br />And it so happens, I&#39;m way ahead of both of you on this.</p>
<p>&#8220;Taylor cutowrth is on every blog in town withhis attack ad garbage.&#8221; ~Terry</p>
<p>I&#39;ve been starting to see these sorts of dismissive remarks about me else where and its always from the Liberal supporters, so I must be getting closer to the truth as its looking rather organized.<br />They get like this when they can&#39;t explain their positions or reasoning they resort to attacking.</p>
<p>Not much different to how the &#8220;Liberals&#8221; are like when in the HOC and committees&#8230;</p>
<p>I bet some of you are part of their campaigners or the even some MPs family members as such things have been suggested before. </p>
<p>like Gayle for instance and others, but I don&#39;t wish to speculate any further at this time.</p>
<p>No doubt, there are others reading this who know what I mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>From Time magazine - Verbatim Friday, Nov. 02, 2007&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe Stephen Harper SHOULD plagiarize this (Change the context to today&#039;s 2008 economy, and this statement is relevant today): &#039;You can run around like mad people wielding razor blades, but it is not the best way to resolve the problem.&#039; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VLADIMIR PUTIN, President of Russia, speaking out against U.S. sanctions on Iran over the country&#039;s nuclear program</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Time magazine &#8211; Verbatim Friday, Nov. 02, 2007</p>
<p>Maybe Stephen Harper SHOULD plagiarize this (Change the context to today&#39;s 2008 economy, and this statement is relevant today): &#39;You can run around like mad people wielding razor blades, but it is not the best way to resolve the problem.&#39; </p>
<p>VLADIMIR PUTIN, President of Russia, speaking out against U.S. sanctions on Iran over the country&#39;s nuclear program</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New to this blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>New to this blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New to this blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/10/example-of-plagiarism-by-stephane-dion/comment-page-2/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>New to this blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1190#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>dirtiness of the liberals?? why because the tories are creating campaign ads with puffins pooping on them? common look at the smear campaign against Dion the tories have ran. Atleast the liberals (to the best of my knowledge) keep their ads about Conservatives policies etc. The Tories initially ran ads sole on how dion shruged in parliament, or the classic &quot;this is not fair&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really dont care it makes this election interesting, but call it fair. The tories ads are dirtier then the libs by no comparison..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dirtiness of the liberals?? why because the tories are creating campaign ads with puffins pooping on them? common look at the smear campaign against Dion the tories have ran. Atleast the liberals (to the best of my knowledge) keep their ads about Conservatives policies etc. The Tories initially ran ads sole on how dion shruged in parliament, or the classic &#8220;this is not fair&#8221;.</p>
<p>I really dont care it makes this election interesting, but call it fair. The tories ads are dirtier then the libs by no comparison&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

