<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PMO listserv exploited by anti-Harper activist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/</link>
	<description>email@stephentaylor.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: freestyle</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>freestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>Hey John, your observation is completely valid, I suspect the same!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Emma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John, your observation is completely valid, I suspect the same!</p>
<p>Emma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>A voters dilemma and a way out.&lt;br&gt;Harper is reforming the Conservatives in a way that the majority of Canadians fear. If he gets in with a minority he will act as if he is the majority and who would dare bring him down and precipitate a new election.  A strategy is needed to  unify the vote against Harper.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To a person other parties leaders are against him.  Elizabeth Mae said she would like to see a Liberal minority.  Ducette shows nothing but contempt.  Dion accuses Harper of lying.  But Jack Layton gave the clue to Harper&#039;s defeat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jack Layton urged NDP supporters to vote NDP because it would mean $1.63 into NDP coffers for the next go around.  The same goes for all other parties.  To vote for your candidate of choice is - and we all know this - a wasted vote that in many cases will enhance the possibility of another Harper minority.  We get Harper and your party gets another $1.63.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Donate $3.66 to the party of your choice and vote for the candidate most likely to defeat the &quot;Conservative&quot; in your riding.  The result of this would be to double the finances of the party you choose,  publicly demonstrate the popular support they have and it may be the only way to defeat Harper.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have my cheque ready.  Will you join in this effort?  Like the election to the south of us it would revitalize the grass roots, take the power from the board rooms putting it in the kitchens of the nation.              &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Act now to spread the word. Little time left to save this nation from the Harper economics.&lt;br&gt;          &lt;br&gt;Rod Dawson  &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:onecorsair@yahoo.com&quot;&gt;onecorsair@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A voters dilemma and a way out.<br />Harper is reforming the Conservatives in a way that the majority of Canadians fear. If he gets in with a minority he will act as if he is the majority and who would dare bring him down and precipitate a new election.  A strategy is needed to  unify the vote against Harper.</p>
<p>To a person other parties leaders are against him.  Elizabeth Mae said she would like to see a Liberal minority.  Ducette shows nothing but contempt.  Dion accuses Harper of lying.  But Jack Layton gave the clue to Harper&#39;s defeat.</p>
<p>Jack Layton urged NDP supporters to vote NDP because it would mean $1.63 into NDP coffers for the next go around.  The same goes for all other parties.  To vote for your candidate of choice is &#8211; and we all know this &#8211; a wasted vote that in many cases will enhance the possibility of another Harper minority.  We get Harper and your party gets another $1.63.</p>
<p>Donate $3.66 to the party of your choice and vote for the candidate most likely to defeat the &#8220;Conservative&#8221; in your riding.  The result of this would be to double the finances of the party you choose,  publicly demonstrate the popular support they have and it may be the only way to defeat Harper.   </p>
<p>I have my cheque ready.  Will you join in this effort?  Like the election to the south of us it would revitalize the grass roots, take the power from the board rooms putting it in the kitchens of the nation.              </p>
<p>Act now to spread the word. Little time left to save this nation from the Harper economics.</p>
<p>Rod Dawson  <a href="mailto:onecorsair@yahoo.com">onecorsair@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>Im still not voting conservative, that prank was not done by any party LOL anyways those of you who insist on voting for harper have a look here.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2007/exec/promisebrochure.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2007/exe...&lt;/a&gt; and then read this. the fact is harper screwed eastern canada, were not going to vote conservative. just vote ABC its that easy :) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anythingbutconservative.ca/&quot;&gt;http://anythingbutconservative.ca/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im still not voting conservative, that prank was not done by any party LOL anyways those of you who insist on voting for harper have a look here.  <a href="http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2007/exec/promisebrochure.pdf">http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2007/exe&#8230;</a> and then read this. the fact is harper screwed eastern canada, were not going to vote conservative. just vote ABC its that easy <img src='http://www.stephentaylor.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><a href="http://anythingbutconservative.ca/">http://anythingbutconservative.ca/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeah, its me.</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeah, its me.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;m not even going to touch the comment about him poking fun, but for conversation&#039;s sake, lets say he did. He didn&#039;t, but lets say he did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, minister makes an inappropriate comment. Hmm, yep. According to our laws thats not a crime.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Impersonating the leader of the country, umm, yep, that is a crime.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your attempt at linking the two events is pathetic, as is your understanding of reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#39;m not even going to touch the comment about him poking fun, but for conversation&#39;s sake, lets say he did. He didn&#39;t, but lets say he did.</p>
<p>So, minister makes an inappropriate comment. Hmm, yep. According to our laws thats not a crime.</p>
<p>Impersonating the leader of the country, umm, yep, that is a crime.</p>
<p>Your attempt at linking the two events is pathetic, as is your understanding of reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeah, its me.</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeah, its me.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>Actually, just in Manitoba. Its the province&#039;s telecom company, offering landline, cell phone, internet and cable services. MTS = Manitoba Telecom Service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, just in Manitoba. Its the province&#39;s telecom company, offering landline, cell phone, internet and cable services. MTS = Manitoba Telecom Service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batb</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>batb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>Dan in Windsor: &quot;As it stands, I honestly believe that gov&#039;t policy towards families have been made so that previous Liberal gov&#039;ts could justify increasing immigration because they saw that immigrants voted consistently Liberal.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would put nothing past the Liberals. Nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other thing they did to discourage families with kids, was to encourage women to work outside the home. The Liberal taxation policy for families living on one income with a parent home--usually mom--to care for the kid/s was to tax us to the max. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advantage for the Liberals of having women stream into the workplace? They collected taxes/revenue from them. My staying home collected no revenue and pretty much assured an independent voice speaking out against a lot of their social engineering policies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Liberals = bad news for families with kids&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Liberals x 13 years = families with very few kids, big &quot;need&quot; for immigration&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#039;Anyway you cut it, women in the workplace, immigration meant BIG BUCKS and LOTSA VOTES for the Liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan in Windsor: &#8220;As it stands, I honestly believe that gov&#39;t policy towards families have been made so that previous Liberal gov&#39;ts could justify increasing immigration because they saw that immigrants voted consistently Liberal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would put nothing past the Liberals. Nothing.</p>
<p>The other thing they did to discourage families with kids, was to encourage women to work outside the home. The Liberal taxation policy for families living on one income with a parent home&#8211;usually mom&#8211;to care for the kid/s was to tax us to the max. </p>
<p>Advantage for the Liberals of having women stream into the workplace? They collected taxes/revenue from them. My staying home collected no revenue and pretty much assured an independent voice speaking out against a lot of their social engineering policies.</p>
<p>Liberals = bad news for families with kids</p>
<p>Liberals x 13 years = families with very few kids, big &#8220;need&#8221; for immigration</p>
<p>&#39;Anyway you cut it, women in the workplace, immigration meant BIG BUCKS and LOTSA VOTES for the Liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: East of Eden</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>East of Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>Manitoba Telephone System - or, at least that&#039;s what it was when I was growing up in Winnipeg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manitoba Telephone System &#8211; or, at least that&#39;s what it was when I was growing up in Winnipeg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: East of Eden</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>East of Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>When I lived in Winnipeg (grew up there), MTS was Manitoba Telephone System. If I am not mistaken, it is now part of the Bell Canada family of telecommunications companies. I could be wrong but I think it&#039;s part of Bell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I lived in Winnipeg (grew up there), MTS was Manitoba Telephone System. If I am not mistaken, it is now part of the Bell Canada family of telecommunications companies. I could be wrong but I think it&#39;s part of Bell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markalanwhittle</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>markalanwhittle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>MTS is an Internet service provider out west.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MTS is an Internet service provider out west.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan in Windsor</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/09/pmo-listserv-exploited-by-anti-harper-activist/comment-page-2/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan in Windsor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=1137#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>EI benefits, if they can be called that, are 55% of &quot;insurable&quot; earnings. The maximum for insurable earnings is $41,000 (roughly). So your EI premiums stop being deducted when you pass $41k gross earnings. Now, when you want to claim EI for parental leave, or any other allowed claim, you only get 55% of $41k if you made $41k or more. I&#039;d be having more kids if my taxes went to pay for 100% of their education. I&#039;d be having more kids if I could split my income with my wife. As it stands, I honestly believe that gov&#039;t policy towards families have been made so that previous Liberal gov&#039;ts could justify increasing immigration because they saw that immigrants voted consistently Liberal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Watch this post to be flagged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EI benefits, if they can be called that, are 55% of &#8220;insurable&#8221; earnings. The maximum for insurable earnings is $41,000 (roughly). So your EI premiums stop being deducted when you pass $41k gross earnings. Now, when you want to claim EI for parental leave, or any other allowed claim, you only get 55% of $41k if you made $41k or more. I&#39;d be having more kids if my taxes went to pay for 100% of their education. I&#39;d be having more kids if I could split my income with my wife. As it stands, I honestly believe that gov&#39;t policy towards families have been made so that previous Liberal gov&#39;ts could justify increasing immigration because they saw that immigrants voted consistently Liberal.</p>
<p>Watch this post to be flagged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

