This is what we must do, op-eds are absolutely our only hope of getting the truth out there but that may be difficult given the makeup of the Press. Failing that, it's up to Conservative bloggers to call the various media hacks on all their attempts to skew the facts to manipulate opinion.

This is what we must do, op-eds are absolutely our only hope of getting the truth out there but that may be difficult given the makeup of the Press. Failing that, it's up to Conservative bloggers to call the various media hacks on all their attempts to skew the facts to manipulate opinion.

Perhaps a Conservative-friendly blog should have a daily post quoting the opposition leaders' accusations with the fact side by side with their fiction.

Just remember: Elizabeth May is studying to become an Anglican priest, so her messianic message isn't so surprising.

What I don't quite understand is how she's going to be an Anglican priest AND a member of parliament if she's elected to the HOC. Either she thinks that priestly duties are negligible (boy, she's got a lot to learn) or she thinks being an MP is a cake walk and something she can juggle with priesthood.

Either way, she's living in La-La-Land and, frankly, I don't see why she should be a participant in the party debates. She hasn't even been elected to Parliament, so what makes her think she's entitled to be heard with the ELECTED leaders of the other parties?

Ms May thinks far too highly of herself and seems to feel that the rest of us should hold her in as high esteem as she holds herself. Science fiction? Well it's certainly some kind of fiction–maybe fantasy?

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/indepth/fed_election/s…

Excerpts of this “report” below

Far be it for Bruce Cheadle and Canadian Press (and watch for lock-step anti-Conservative activist “reporters” from CBC, CTV, Globe & Mail, Toronto Star, etc., etc.) to simply report facts. They just can’t resist interpretation, excuses for their side, highlighting negatives for the Conservatives, and overlooking failures and weaknesses for their side (ie. Liberals). As reported this morning on Bourque, “CBC's Mansbridge inexplicably breaks away from hostile Dion press conference to go to the marginalized Bloq/Duceppe press'er”

The Conservative Party won’t just be fighting the Liberals, NDP and Bloc in this election. They will also be fighting the combined resources of the CBC, CTV, Globe and Mail, Toronto Star and Canadian Press among many others, who will do everything in their power to swing the vote to prevent a Conservative win, or at the very least, a Conservative majority.

In Canada, as in the U.S., election “reporting” by the mainstream media has become little more than a thinly-disguised advocacy for the agents of big government, doctrinaire multilateralism and wealth redistribution.

Excerpts:
By Bruce Cheadle, The Canadian Press

“… Prime Minister Stephen Harper, weary of waiting for the opposition to bring down his minority government, dashed his promise of a fixed election date and pulled the plug himself …”

Straight reporting – Stephen Harper went to the Governor General and asked that parliament be dissolved to call an election. Period.

“… Harper said this election will be a choice between certainty and risk at a time when the world economy has entered a period of instability – a statement aimed at scaring voters away from Liberal Leader Stephane Dion's proposed overhaul of Canada's tax system. …”

Straight reporting – the second part of this paragraph departs from Harper’s quote to give a negative interpretation, and misrepresenting a 1% income tax cut to the lower and middle class in return for massive tax increases on just about anything involving energy as a positive “overhaul of Canada’s tax system”.

“… Harper's managerial acumen in a slowing economy will be pitted against Dion's “Green Shift” plan – designed to shift taxation off income and on to greenhouse gas-emissions. …”

Straight reporting – in fact the tax increases that come with the “Green Shift” are massively in excess of the tiny 1% income tax cut only to the lower and middle classes – in fact a massive tax grab to finance Liberal pet projects, and likely at the cost of huge increases in costs of goods and services to Canadians who will thus be negatively affected by Liberal carbon taxes. The last part of this paragraph was added as an editorial pitch for the Liberal plan.

“… Dion accused Harper of abandoning the poor, squandering the $12-billion surplus left by the Liberals, …”

Straight reporting – by definition a surplus means the government over-taxed the taxpayers in excess of their promises and budgeted needs. So Canadian Press’s “squandered surplus” is a responsible accountant’s definition of over-taxation. The smaller the “surplus”, as long as it isn’t a deficit, the better the management. Big surpluses to be blown are only positive to big-taxing, big-spending advocates.

“… Public opinion polling over the past year suggests another minority is in the offing – common wisdom that's been openly embraced by Harper, who doesn't want to scare off voters wary of what a Tory majority might do. …”

Straight reporting – the last part of this paragraph is blatant campaigning against the Conservatives by a reporter who wants to resurrect the spectre of the scary “hidden agenda” of Stephen Harper. Disgusting, irresponsible – and, in my opinion, unprofessional.

“… The autumn of their first year in power, the Conservatives galvanized one angry constituency with $2 billion in spending cuts that targeted such things as the court challenges program, adult literacy and women's programs – while posting a $13 billion surplus for 2005-06. …”

Straight reporting – a review of all of the negative reports of the Conservative’s mandate to reinforce the Liberal’s “scary” campaign is mandatory for the anti-Conservative media. Typical.

“… They infuriated another constituency by breaking an election promise and restricting income trusts. … “

Straight reporting – more reviewing and highlighting of early-mandate negatives – don’t want the voters to forget them do we!

“… And their first attempt at environmental legislation was greeted with such widespread disdain that it was all but scrapped and the minister was shuffled. … “

Straight reporting – yet more negatives from only one point of view – “widespread disdain” is only from the Liberal side of the spectrum.

“… Harper also shocked the Commons by announcing he would recognize “the Quebecois” as a nation within a united Canada. …”

Straight reporting – can you imagine Canadian Press, or any other leftist outlet, highlighting this as a negative if it had come from Dion, Chretien, or Martin?! This is designed to remind western Conservatives and weaken Harper’s base.

Completely missing from this “report” – any mention at all of Stephane Dion’s failure to connect with English Canada, his weak leadership, his unpopular “Green Shift” plan at a time of record energy prices, the questions over the revenue-neutrality of his plan, the disharmony within the Liberal Party, Dion’s inability to communicate with 75% of Canadians, disorganization and lack of funds within the Liberal Party, loss of support for the Liberals in Quebec and falling support in Ontario, – and on and on.

This will be the type of “reporting” the Harper Conservatives will have to deal with for the next 5 weeks as the mainstream leftist media in Canada does its very best to thwart his plans for a win, and especially a majority government. The usual suspects who have already made up their minds to vote Liberal – NDP – Green will not be swayed, nor will hard-core conservatives.

But those who haven’t yet decided how they will vote should read all media reports with a very critical eye, and most important of all, consider the source. Editorial interpretation and media spin should not be confused with hard facts.

There is indeed a “hidden agenda” in this election, but it isn’t from the Harper Conservatives. It is from the ranks of the committed social activists who have taken over the mainstream media in this country, and for whom the spectre of a second Harper mandate is anathema, and for whom a Harper majority would represent a repudiation of all they represent.

The rampant anti-McCaine/Palin agenda of the mainstream media in the U.S. has been exposed for what it is, and derision and well-deserved abuse is being heaped on them as a result. They are now becoming the brunt of late night talk show host jokes and monologues. With any luck at all the same hard scrutiny will be applied to our own activist media, and they will be exposed for the unapologetic advocates they really are. Any resemblance of objective reporting will be accidental, or the bare minimum needed to retain a modicum of even-handedness. I’m not holding my breath.

The above interpretation of today’s election call is but the first shot from a very hostile media corps.

The NDP campaign strategy is a two-step process. First they try to establish Layton as a potential prime minister and thus capitalize on his superior leadership numbers over Dion. As Dion starts to crash, Layton will then appeal to unhappy Liberal supporters to unite the Left behind the NDP.

There is no prospect of Dion being considered a replacement for Harper, and once that sinks in, Layton will harvest the Liberal vote … even if it means a Harper majority government. Layton's only objective is to raise the NDP to Official Opposition Party status and let the Conservatives have their 4 years of government.

If Harper only has a minority government that will be even more favourable for Layton, because as Leader of the Opposition, he will be able to consistently vote non-confidence while the leaderless, recovering Liberals abstain for another year. Both of these scenarios are acceptable to Harper because it decimates the Liberal party. Layton knows that as long as the Liberals are a viable alternative to the Conservatives, the NDP will always suck the hind tit in fourth place and hoping to have the balance of power..