Comments on: Does Elizabeth May fundamentally agree or disagree?

By: Gbong

Gbong — Mon, 02 May 2011 03:33:00 +0000

I am just delighted to obtain this content very helpful to me, as it carries great deal of insight. I always favor to read the high quality content and this thing I noticed in your post. Gives thanks for spreading this one.

By: Marcial Dave

Marcial Dave — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:26:00 +0000

Another well-known figure is included to my list. To understand about a well-noted personality on the web is quiet entertaining. You've offered an tremendous focus concerning the write-up publicized. Carpet Cleaning Vancouver

By: Couttscrossing

Couttscrossing — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:57:21 +0000

For Elaine May to claim the King said to her “personally” he was outraged by Climate Change and it was more important than AIDS which affects over 70% of his population could not be true. The Dane caught it immediately that this U.S. educated “King” would never break with protocol and speak in such a manner. It has been rumoured that May, like so many other environmentalists have dangled a carrot…you back us on climate control and we will make sure you receive transfer payments WITH NO STRINGS ATTACHED. Of course, this did not happen at Copenhagen.

When May was losing the debate it was evident what a churlish shrill woman she is. She started to attack her worthy debating opponents on a personal level. This demonstrates to the “stupid” Canadian voters that she is not worthy of any political position of power.

By: Couttscrossing

Couttscrossing — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:21 +0000

By: carpet cleaning miami

carpet cleaning miami — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:00:36 +0000

I can say that Ms. May is really a frank one..

By: Steam Cleaning

Steam Cleaning — Sun, 10 May 2009 17:39:34 +0000

Nice video but it was low in quality.
Try to provide a clearer one.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:26:00 +0000

Ms. May is a very obnoxious woman who is rude and talks incessantly no matter the subject. She should not interpret her being included in the debates as support from ordinary Canadians of her political platform. Canadians wanted her in the debate because it was a matter of fairness. However, I predict when she is included in the debates she will be seen as not fit to be elected nor any of her candidates because the Greens policies do not represent what Canadians believe to be the way forward.

By: Casual observer

Casual observer — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:00:10 +0000

so for all those who were ranting tha the Greens MUST be in the debates for the LEADERSHIP of this country, how y'all liking this Eleizabeth May so far?

By: Helen

Helen — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:20:48 +0000

Anyone wanting to know more about Elizabeth May would do well to read Elaine Dewars 1995 book, Cloak of Green which, though somewhat dated, is an excellent expose of the environmental movement and Mays part in it. Now she comes across as your innocent, maiden aunt but, in reality she''s a dangerous idealogue.

By: batb

batb — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:11:49 +0000

Thanks for the clarification, Stephen. When you write "I first posted the Youtube clip under my Youtube username 'stimpyloveseggs' on September 10th," who would know?!!!

That's why I was puzzled that Susan Ormiston stated that when the clip was posted to YouTube, "it went viral." What seemed to make it go viral was the Green Party's threat to sue Leftdog's Buckdog Blog.

Even if the timeline is accurate, it was nevertheless a convoluted piece, and though Susan Ormiston left it up to her viewers to decide what Eliza May said, she played the same clip a number of times in which it was clear that Ms. May said "...Canadians are stupid…and I agree with that assessment." Ormiston doesn't even mention the DIS-agree controversy begun when Ms. May asserted that she had said "disagree," though made it clear that YOU were the one who was "up to" "political tricks."

It also still remains for the Green Party to apologize to you for accusing you of doctoring the tape. That wasn't made clear by Ormiston either. Rather, the piece was ambiguous about who John Bennett apologized to. It wasn't you! But, again, who would know?!!!