<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBC blindsides Harper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2006/08/cbc-blindsides-harper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2006/08/cbc-blindsides-harper/</link>
	<description>email@stephentaylor.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ray Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2006/08/cbc-blindsides-harper/comment-page-1/#comment-25246</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ray Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=596#comment-25246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you interpreted the clip used in the report as being unfavourable to the Arab side specifically. When I watched that clip, I saw him referring not to the Arab side in particular but to the fact that there are various communities with (let&#039;s face it) pretty predictable biases. When you showed the longer clip, I couldn&#039;t figure out what contradiction you were trying to point out: that one and the excerpt were saying the same thing as far as I could see. It was only when I saw your question afterward that I saw you were actually reading a biased interpretation into the use of the shorter clip. I think you&#039;re quite off side on this, sorry. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you interpreted the clip used in the report as being unfavourable to the Arab side specifically. When I watched that clip, I saw him referring not to the Arab side in particular but to the fact that there are various communities with (let&#8217;s face it) pretty predictable biases. When you showed the longer clip, I couldn&#8217;t figure out what contradiction you were trying to point out: that one and the excerpt were saying the same thing as far as I could see. It was only when I saw your question afterward that I saw you were actually reading a biased interpretation into the use of the shorter clip. I think you&#8217;re quite off side on this, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Taylor &#8211; a blog on Canadian politics &#187; Patrick Muttart sustains pressure on CBC regarding its inappropriate partisan affiliation</title>
		<link>http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2006/08/cbc-blindsides-harper/comment-page-1/#comment-12933</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Taylor &#8211; a blog on Canadian politics &#187; Patrick Muttart sustains pressure on CBC regarding its inappropriate partisan affiliation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephentaylor.ca/?p=596#comment-12933</guid>
		<description>[...] that other clip from being from a completely different story at a completely different time. They tied them together to make it look as though it was one story and it made the Prime Minister lo..., and then the CBC had to apologize on The National for doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that other clip from being from a completely different story at a completely different time. They tied them together to make it look as though it was one story and it made the Prime Minister lo&#8230;, and then the CBC had to apologize on The National for doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

